Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wollongong, Australia
    Posts
    9

    Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    I have been using Minolta Spotmeter F for years. While the spotmeter worked great and consistently, I was eyeing the Pentax spotmeter due to its dial exposure calculator. With Minolta, I had to push too many buttons to get the required shutter speed. Minolta only works in time priority mode and I use aperture priority for B&W landscapes. Well, I finally got the Pentax digital spotmeter and would like to share my first impressions and ask a couple of questions..

    When first comparing the two, I noticed that the Pentax viewfinder is about 1 stop dimmer than Minolta. This came as a surprise, since the lens diameter seems to be the same as for Minolta and the magnification is less than for Minolta. I also noticed that the spot circle is much easier to see in Spotmeter F: it gets dark with bright background and somehow it shines when there is a dark background. With Pentax, it is difficult to see the circle with background at EV 5 or less.... I read many forums before buying the Pentax, but no one mentioned this issue, I wonder would there be variations between the Pentax digital spotmeters (serial number on my is 117752 and it is zone VI modified)?

    Second observation is that the Pentax reads about 1 EV less than Minolta. Using a spotmeter on a digital camera, the reading was the same as for Minolta. Now I wonder would this be due to zone VI modification, plus better glare handling of multicoated Pentax spotmeter? I made a hole on white cardboard and put it in front of shoe-box that had black wrapping paper inside. Measuring the reading of the hole and comparing it to the reading on the white cardboard, I got about 3 stops less on the hole with Minolta and about 3.5-4 stops less with Pentax (the white board gave ~ EV 17). Both of them gave too high EV, but Pentax less so (reading off the wrapping paper from behind the white paper gave about EV 9).

    My third observation was that Pentax drained the battery much more than expected. I was using 6V silver oxide battery, which was supposed to hold 6.1 V for long time. However after only a few hours of playing with the spotmeter, the voltage dropped to 5.7 V (the temperature was about 15 C). I went to measure the current drain of the battery: it was 18 mA when measuring with lid on the lens and about 23 mA with lid removed from the lens. Without metering, the current was zero. I gather there may be a problem with my spotmeter, draining too much of the current. This current would correspond to effective circuitry resistance of 300 Ohms, way too low....In comparison, Minolta spotmeter drained only about 0.2-0.3 mA (on 1.5V battery). I wonder if anyone else had a similar experience with Pentax spotmeter??

    Overall, the Pentax spotmeter is nicer to handle than the Spotmeter F, even though it is difficult to locate the spot circle in dim light. Pentax feels better in hands and is less fiddly to use. However, the battery drain is a concern... I suspect a battery may have leaked in the past, living a conductive path inside the meter.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    If the meter you have was altered by Zone VI, the readings may be different than that of other meters. Also, I would suspect the Minolta and the digital camera of being skewed toward Zone Vi rather than V nore than I would the Pentax. Mine does not drain the battery fast. I change it every year whether I need to or not.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    grand rapids
    Posts
    3,851

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    If you read up on the pentax you'll find that the meter can read outside the spot circle area in some cases. Not sure what causes it but I've owned three of them before my current model and the first two were off by quite a bit. This can be fixed with proper calibration. Check your meter reading at the edge of a bright/dark edge like a corner of a building in full sun.
    The minolta is brighter, I do miss that.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    84

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    Funny, I've had exactly the opposite experience and don't use my Minolta spot anymore.

    Quote Originally Posted by vinny View Post
    If you read up on the pentax you'll find that the meter can read outside the spot circle area in some cases. Not sure what causes it but I've owned three of them before my current model and the first two were off by quite a bit. This can be fixed with proper calibration. Check your meter reading at the edge of a bright/dark edge like a corner of a building in full sun.
    The minolta is brighter, I do miss that.
    Perfection is a moving target.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    The Spotmeter F was my first spot meter. I thought it was a fine meter for someone who wanted and used all of its features. But I just wanted a spot meter for zone system purposes, i.e. to give me read-outs in EVs and convert them to zones. All the other features the Minolta had and all the things it did were unimportant to me and they just got in the way. So I sold it and bought a Pentax which does only one thing but does that one thing quickly, easily, and accurately. I didn't have any of the issues with it that you mention, particularly not the battery problem.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  6. #6
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,394

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    I've had about four Pentax digital spotmeters and one Minolta F. They all read exactly the
    same, but the Pentax is a lot quicker and more spontaneous to use. I recalibrate them
    about once a decade (one particular meter is simply kept in the lab unused, just to check the others, and as a reserve if I ever need it).

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wollongong, Australia
    Posts
    9

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    Hi vinny,
    Both meters seem to measure pretty much within the circle, I was scanninng the "hole on the shoe box" . My Pentax actually has two concentric circles in the center... In the Pentax manual they do mention that the spotmeter is likely to give lower readings than the spotmeters from other brands, because of improved way they deal with internal reflections. I wouldn't expect this to amount for 1 stop difference, though. Anyway, when I got my Minolta, I re-calibrated it to my previous meter (Gossen Lunasix F) and that calibration just happened to coincide with the reading of my Olympus spotmeter at the time. The calibration does not bother me too much, I can easily re-adjust the zone sticker to account for the discrepancy.
    Thanks, Joseph
    Last edited by jhorvat; 9-Jul-2012 at 17:15. Reason: spelling

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wollongong, Australia
    Posts
    9

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Noel View Post
    If the meter you have was altered by Zone VI, the readings may be different than that of other meters. Also, I would suspect the Minolta and the digital camera of being skewed toward Zone Vi rather than V nore than I would the Pentax. Mine does not drain the battery fast. I change it every year whether I need to or not.
    This is a good point, Jim,
    If the zone VI calibration puts the "mid-grey", whatever that might be, on zone VI, it effectively increases the exposure by one stop, as compared to the meters centered to zone V. That is exactly what I am getting...
    Joseph

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wollongong, Australia
    Posts
    9

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    I just found at: http://www.largeformatphotography.in...p/t-42707.html
    that Eric Woodbury estimates the battery drain of 10-20 mA for Pentax digital spotmeter. With 20 mA drain and say 140 mAh capacity, this would translate to about 7 working hours per battery. Funny, my Minolta spotmeter drains about 100 times less current with 1.5V battery. However, when turning the light on in Minolta's viewfinder, the current jumps to about 10 mA. This makes me thinking, Pentax uses different (bright) LED's in its viewfinder, with which there is no need for a separate light source in low light conditions. This may translate into a higher battery consumption. I guess it is possible that over a year, we only use the spotmeter for less than 7 hours in total.
    However, this all begs another question. There was plenty of talk in the forums on the need for a battery with very flat discharge curve (i.e. constant voltage) for Pentax spotmetrs. That's why silver oxide batteries are recommended as best. The problem being, they seem to have flat discharge curve only at low currents, less than 1 mA. I am using Black Diamond brand silver oxide cell and voltage dropped quickly from about 6.3 V to 5.7 V. It recovered overnight to 5.85 V, to drop again to 5.61 V after use. The temperatures are between 10 and 15 C. I wonder how low it will go after a few months' use. So far, I don't see any difference in reading due to the voltage drop, as compared to Spotmeter F (i.e. the difference remains at 1 stop).
    Did anyone measure the voltage of silver oxide cells in their Pentax spotmeters through a year of use?
    The guy that sold me the spotmeter has another one and he will measure the current drain on his spotmeter tomorrow, will keep you posted.
    Joseph

  10. #10
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,394

    Re: Pentax digital spotmeter: differences with Minolta Spotmeter F

    I seem to need a new battery in the Pentax about every six years, and I use it all the time.
    I prefer silver oxide batteries, but don't know how that dovetails into all the "what if" math,
    which sounds like BS to me anyway. As a matter of common sense, I carry a spare battery in my kit, but the original one in the meter seems to last so long that once I fetch the replacement, it is past its official expiration date anyway! In extreme cold, like winter
    snow camping, I put the meter in the sleeping bag with me at nite to keep the batter warm, or else remove the battery and put it in a pocket. Otherwise, I don't have any issues with either silver oxide or alkaline batteries, and not reading discrepancies either.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 8-Oct-2016, 08:37

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •