Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Why Forte?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    538

    Why Forte?

    Mr. Martin Reekie kindly posted an announcement recently that the Forte website is back in action. Nice looking site. But it got me wondering.

    I’m not much of a fine artist, but I’ve managed to earn a (commercial) living with sheet film since “Laugh-In” was on television. For everything I’ve seen and learned over the years, I have never actually seen a box of Forte film. Never knew anyone who used it, either.

    So I was just wondering, what special product qualities do these folks have to compete with other films and papers? What’s the company history? (They seem to be Hungarian?) Could any of you “heavy users” bring me up to speed?

    Many thanks for your help.

  2. #2
    Clay
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    364

    Why Forte?

    It has the same cult appeal as pet rocks and chia pets. Mumble 'silver-rich' and 'thick emulsion' and dismiss sensitometric data as senseless, and there you go.. ...

    Seriously, it is not a bad film, but if you do real world tests on it, it has trouble building significant image density, and does not respond with a wide contrast range to development time variations. It seems to work a little better in pyro type staining developers. But it is a nice inherently low contrast film that works well in high contrast pictorial situations.... like many other films. It is relatively cheap, and if Kodak continues on its current course, it may soon be all we can get. Like most things, you can make it work if you put in the time to understand its quirks.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Richmond Virginia
    Posts
    139

    Why Forte?

    I have used the company's polywarmtone fiber semi-matt paper, and it is a very nice paper. It looks good. It does respond differently than the Agfa and Ilford papers I have been using, but appears to offer some very nice results. I need to work with it more to better evaluate it's potential. Seems to be a well-liked warm toned paper, from what I've read.

  4. #4
    the Docter is in Arne Croell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    1,210

    Why Forte?

    Their papers, especially their chlorobromide fiber-based ones, are probably much better known than their film. For instance, John Sexton uses Polywarmtone occasionally.

  5. #5

    Why Forte?

    I tried Forte paper a few years ago and found it to ge excellent when I first opened the box. After letting it sit in the paper safe for a couple of months it had changed dramatically. The images were lower in contrast and when washed the emulsion peeled off around the edges. The Kodak and Ilford papers also in the paper safe had not change any.

  6. #6
    wfwhitaker
    Guest

    Why Forte?

    I'm not a "heavy user", but I am very fond of Forte Polywarmtone Plus fiber base paper. I love the results I get with it and have not experienced any problems. And frankly in this day and age, the more film and papers that remain on the market, the better off we all are.

  7. #7
    All metric sizes to 24x30 Ole Tjugen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,383

    Why Forte?

    Fortezo Museum gives beautiful lith prints. I haven't used any of the films, poly- or RC papers, though; I'm changing to all graded paper since there are so many really good papers out there!

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    125

    Why Forte?

    "It has the same cult appeal as pet rocks and chia pets. Mumble 'silver-rich' and 'thick emulsion' and dismiss sensitometric data as senseless, and there you go.. ... "

    Never having bought either one, I wouldn't know about pet rocks or chia pets, but I have tried all the alleged "old style" films which purport to deliver qualities similar to Super XX Pan. The best of these is Efke PL100, but none of these films (Forte, JandC Classic 200, Bergger BPF 200, Efke R50, Efke R25, Efke PL100, Fomapan) offers the density, ease of control and overall consistent quality of 400TMax. The prints I get from it are consistently better by any measure, whether sensitometric or intuitive. When the Great Yellow Father announces this film's demise, I'll be buying a lifetime supply. I can't tell you anything about the Forte papers (I use only Azo and Bergger papers), but as to the film my advice would be "don't waste your money like I did".

  9. #9
    Whatever David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Posts
    4,658

    Why Forte?

    I tried Forte Elegance paper and found it too green for my taste, but some people seem to like it. I also tried Fortepan 400 under the "ClassicPan" label and found it didn't have the density range I needed, but they have said they planned to improve it sometime around now.

    Fomapan T200 (35mm and 120 only) is kind of interesting as a special effect--like a film from the 1930s.

    Efke PL100 is a nice film with a good density range and attractive curve, and it comes in all sizes. I've been testing it in 4x5", and I'll probably use it in 11x14". It looks great in pyro.

    Another East European product that I really like is Maco/Cachet Expo enlarging paper. It's neutral to very slightly warm with solid blacks and good shadow detail. They claim to have a higher gold chloride content than other premium enlarging papers.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ballater, Scotland
    Posts
    27

    Why Forte?

    John,

    Forte are Hungarian, they are based in the old Kodak works in Vac. They are one of the last manufacturers to maintain a full range of traditionally formulated fibre-base papers. For this reason alone they should be supported! They also actively research new products such as the innovative warm-tone VC fibre paper Polywarmtone.

    As commented above they are better known for their papers, their films are reasonable and certainly have applications. From the large format point of view they will cut any size of film you want, for a smallish production run.

    Their papers are, however, stunning. The new VC Polywarmtone is a gorgeous paper, similar in effect to the old Kodak Ektalure or Oriental Seagull Portrait, warm emulsion with a warm base. The Fortezo Musuem is a great paper for exhibition printing, very heavy base 280 g/m² and an emulsion that takes selenium toning beautifully, very reminiscent of the old Agfa Record Rapid, the blue label stuff before Agfa “improved” it.

    When companies like Agfa are deserting large format altogether, Kodak are rapidly closing down anything that might be looked upon as minority interest and Ilford are rationalising their traditional black and white materials companies like Forte have to be supported because without them the choice we have as photographers will be very limited. Besides they are very good products!

    Martin

Similar Threads

  1. What's up with Forte?
    By paulr in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14-Dec-2005, 02:17
  2. Forte Paper???
    By Mark d. RobertsMark d. Roberts in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 14-Apr-2005, 07:31
  3. News on Forte
    By Andrew O'Neill in forum Announcements
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2004, 22:48
  4. Forte going down the tubes as well?
    By tim atherton in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 3-Oct-2004, 08:24
  5. Forte film dev.
    By Emrehan Zeybekoglu in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 24-Mar-2004, 15:47

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •