Originally Posted by
Steve McLevie
I'm just having a look at the analogue - digital - analogue route at present and I see this Durst machine.
My little 35mm Nikon scanner (5000ED) does 48bits per pixel does it not ? At 4000 dpi supposedly...
So when they boast 36 bits per pixel on the Durst isn't that a little lame ? How long has this thing been made ? Why would you go get an expensive colour drum scan made - say an Aztec Premier - then get it printed on a Durst Lambda ?
Am I missing something here ??
Is the process from digital to analogue harder to achieve ?
The 400 ppi maximum printing resolution is also pretty awful, No ? At least 600 ...
Maybe a new model is on the way and some competitors ...
Bookmarks