I posed this question in an email to another member. I'll post it here in case some of you Wollensak experts have any ideas.
This lens seems kind of unusual. It's marked "Wollensak 8x10 Rapid Rectilinear" on the outside of the barrel. There are no other cell markings. It's the typical black Wollensak finish and mounted in a Betax #4 shutter. It has a single aperture scale with ƒ/8 as the widest mark, although the iris opens up beyond that and someone crudely scratched 6.3 on the scale.
I can't find it in the Cameraeccentric catalogs. Last mention of a rapid rectilinear is in 1906. The Betax doesn't appear until 1922. There is mention of a three-focus ƒ/8 symmetrical in 1912, but it's a convertible and mine is not. Besides, mine is clearly marked "Rapid Rectilinear". Of course, having catalogs for the intervening years would help. But based on what I have to go on, those dates are as close as I can get.
So, it's a puzzle. The shutter looks original to the lens, yet it's a lens type which pre-dates the shutter by quite some time. The anastigmats showed up in the 1912 catalog and it doesn't make any sense that Wollensak would continue to market "old technology". In 1916 there's mention of their budget offering, the Vinco anastigmat (later the Series IV Velostigmat) with a pejorative reference to the rapid rectilinear:
"Many are the amateur and commercial photographers whose ambition it is to rid themselves of the R. R. type lens, which so handicaps the Progressive, and replace it with an Anastigmat,..."
It was clear that Wollensak wanted to sell the new technology and disparaged the old as undesirable. So how did I end up with a lens that's a "handicap" in a later shutter?
And who were the "Progressives"? Was that another name for Secessionists?
Bookmarks