Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

  1. #1
    pixelatedscraps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    16

    Question 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Please bear with me, my LF knowledge could still be rated as 'mildly stupid' despite my best efforts to read through as many posts and tutorials as I could find.

    As my first LF camera, I managed to snag a Busch Pressman D in very good condition for $165 off a kind member on RFF. It comes with a 135mm f/4.5 Steinheil-Munchen Culminar but I am looking for a 105mm and a 270mm to cover my two favorite focal lengths for landscape and portrait work.

    I am still a bit unsure about what lens boards I need, along with which kind of shutters would work on the Pressman (Copal #0?). I do know that due to the length of the bellows, I would be hard pressed to use anything wider than a 90mm or anything longer than a 270mm.

    If you could recommend a 105mm and a 270mm for roughly $200-$300 each, what would you recommend? (along with any other advice to correct what I might have misunderstood above)

    Thanks!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Both of your desired focals are uncommon in 4X5. So even though there are some lenses in those lengths, there aren't very many options.

    105mm will have to be a Wide Angle type. Fuji made a good one. All the other mfr's congregated around 90mm lenses and there are tons of those to choose from.

    270 is also a bit of an oddball. I can't think of a single one that would have qualities I would look for in a portrait lens. Also, anything with a nice wide aperture conducive to portraits will be pushing the max for your lens board size. A 210mm f4.5 Xenar in Compound shutter might please you. You're probably extrapolating these numbers from favorite sized in other formats, and may find the 4X5 more forgiving to portraits with shorter focals. For a head and bust the 210 will be near 270mm on the bellows in any case.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,640

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Galli View Post
    105mm will have to be a Wide Angle type. Fuji made a good one.
    FWIW, Fuji has offered both a wide angle (SW) and a wide-field plasmat (NW(S), CMW) in the 105mm focal length. The former is a big lens that may be a difficult fit to a Pressman. The latter should work, though its coverage doesn't leave much room for movement.

  4. #4
    pixelatedscraps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    16

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    I suppose with 4x5 cropping doesn't suffer as much of a degradation as it does on smaller formats. If 90 / 300mm lenses are more common, perhaps the wisest thing to do would be alter my expectations and look there.

    Jim, not sure what you meant by this comment though: For a head and bust the 210 will be near 270mm on the bellows in any case.

    If I was looking at 90mm / 300mm lenses, what would a good place to start on a budget? I will be shooting solely in B&W, if that makes a difference in LF.

  5. #5

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Although I had many lenses to choose from, my final kit for the Pressman I had consisted of a 90mm Angulon, a 135mm Culminar (or a 150mm Symmar-S, depending on how light I wanted to travel), and a 210mm Geronar. I was always quite comfortable with this assortment. An Angulon and a Geronar would both be within your stated budget. If you really think you need a longer lens, one of the 240mm teles might fit on the board and through the front standard and be reasonably priced.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Quote Originally Posted by pixelatedscraps View Post
    I suppose with 4x5 cropping doesn't suffer as much of a degradation as it does on smaller formats. If 90 / 300mm lenses are more common, perhaps the wisest thing to do would be alter my expectations and look there.

    Jim, not sure what you meant by this comment though: For a head and bust the 210 will be near 270mm on the bellows in any case.

    If I was looking at 90mm / 300mm lenses, what would a good place to start on a budget? I will be shooting solely in B&W, if that makes a difference in LF.
    Look for a Caltar f6.8 90mm. They were made by Rodenstock and are superb. The 125mm Fujinon is also superb. My favorite in fact.

    The closer you move to your subject with a bellows camera, the more bellows you need. It would be common to have moved the 210 out to 270 if you were a few feet away from your subject. I advise against a 300. You'll be forced to stay at infinity which won't get the job done for portraits. I'm sticking with my original 210 Xenar f4.5. Superb Bokeh and inexpensive. An older 4.5 wide open is what you want for portraits on 4X5. IMHO of course. Check out my web pages and you'll be thinking (dreaming) about petzval's.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Ind.
    Posts
    589

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    The Busch is a great camera, beautifully made, but it comes with certain limitations that are a challenge when you try to make it perform much more than the press camera role it was designed for. These include limited bellows, non-removable back and a very small lens board and opening behind it where the bellows is attached to the front standard.

    Busch Pressman lens boards are unique and a bit uncommon. They are not interchangeable with any other camera's boards (other than the re-branded Sears Tower camera.) You will have to be sharp-eyed to find them on ebay, but they do come up and I have heard of facsimiles sold there as well. You may find it easiest to find a machinist to make you a few.

    The rear element of the Fuji SW 105mm will definitely not fit through the hole in the Busch front standard. I tried. Since the Busch back is not easily removable you don't have the option of installing the rear cell through the back either. As noted earlier, the Fuji 105mm W will fit but provides almost no movements on 4x5.

    You might consider a 100mm Kodak Wide Field Ektar or a 105/6.3 Leitmeyr Weitwinkel or similar smaller wide angles from other defunct manufacturers.

    The Busch only provides about 12 inches of bellows draw so you might look for a true telephoto design for any lens longer than about 240mm. True telephoto lenses will focus to infinity with bellows extension substantially less than their focal length. A Schneider 270mm Tele-Arton may fit on the Busch lens board. There is also a 270mm Rodenstock Rotelar. These tele designs may be just the lenses that Jim Galli described as unsuitable for portraits. However, what is suitable for portraiture is subjective. Jim holds a very distinctive ideal of portraiture, that, while broadly popular, is not an absolute. You may find a tele design fully satisfactory for portraiture. See this sample (not mine) for what a Tele-Arton can do.

    Unfortunately I am afraid that you would be unable to fit the 210/4.5 Xenar's rear cell through the opening in the Busch without some fancy custom lens board or risky modification to the camera.

    Look for lenses in no larger than a #1 shutter. Among non-telephoto designs, you may find a 210mm/6.1 Xenar or a 240/6.8 Rodenstock Ysarex or the same lens branded as a Caltar Type Y. (With the 240 you would be able to focus no closer than about 3 or 4 feet due to the limited bellows.)

    Buy with care. Buy locally if you can so you might try, (or at least handle), before you buy, and insist on a right to return a lens if it does not work out for you.


    Best of Luck - Alan

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,142

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    I'll second the Tele Arton, provided it fits the lensboard. Portraits have been about 95% of the use of mine.
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Tonopah, Nevada, USA
    Posts
    6,334

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Two exquisite portraits done with a 270mm Rotelar on this page here.

    You might send that fellow an message and ask him what his lensboard to ground glass distance was at that distance from the subject.

    Oops, only one done with the Rotelar, but it's the better one.

  10. #10
    pixelatedscraps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    16

    Re: 105mm / 270mm lens recommendations for Busch Pressman D

    Thanks for the suggestions guys, it's been really helpful. I think this has narrowed down my choices a lot. Most likely I'll be looking at one of the 210mm or the 270 tele-arton / rotelar.

    I'll post again once I've found one on the cheap!

    Thanks again

Similar Threads

  1. Lens and film recommendations for 12x20 format?
    By Sergio Ortega in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 18-Jul-2007, 11:42
  2. Can bellows "stretch" lens?
    By Ken Grooms in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 25-Oct-2006, 19:35
  3. How poor is a Schneider G-Claron WA 270mm lens
    By Linhof in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-Jul-2006, 06:27

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •