Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    246

    Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    I just got a minty body Crown and would like to replace the ancient lens with something more modern and working properly. I have only one other LF lens, a 210 Fuji which I use on another camera. I'd like something in the 120-135 range to use both on the crown and the other camera.

    The Nikkor 120 SW f8 has a good reputation for generous coverage and can be had inexpensively (even new). In looking at pictures of it, however, it looks to have a rather large rear element. Will that big element fit into the bellows throat of the Crown without jamming things up?

    Anyone use this combo? Please share your thoughts and suggestions

    Thanks
    Bob

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    7,871

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    Bob, I can't answer your question directly 'cos I don't have a 4x5 Crown or a 120 SW. But I do have a 35/4.5 Apo Grandagon and a 2x3 Crown. Same problem, in spades.

    The solution is to unscrew the rear cell, put board, shutter, and front cell on the front standard and then reattach the rear cell from behind. To take the lens off the camera, reverse the process. Fiddly.

    It can be done and it beats the alternative of not using the lens.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    246

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    So you take the ground glass out each time you want to use the lens?

  4. #4
    jp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    5,349

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    I have not used the 120 SW, but I have just put a nikkor 90/4.5 SW on my speed graphic anniversary 4x5. It fits, and I don't have to take it apart to insert it, but the rear element is so big, it doesn't allow much rise movement before the rear portion of the lens is pushing the bellows around, perhaps half an inch max. If the 120 is a little smaller in back, you might be better off. I don't have any rear size measurements for the two lenses. I do also have a nikon 210/5.6 and that is much smaller in the rear.

    Also while it's not necessary or even expected of most LF cameras, some smaller lenses are thin enough to remain on the speed/crown when it's folded up. For an everyday lens, I like something that is low profile enough to fold into the box. I keep other lenses handy with my film supply and light meter and don't expect those to be so compact. It's a consideration if you want a quick "press" style use option, but if you're using the crown as an inexpensive field camera on a tripod, not so important.

    There's really nothing wrong with using old lenses like tessars and xenars and optars; they are cheap or come with the camera and do a great job stopped down a little bit. They can also have some nice character wide open. The benefit I see of upgrading to a nikkor is to get newer coatings for color use, to be a little crisper resolution wide open, and to have more coverage to use on more than one type of camera.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    246

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    Ability to fold into the box is not critical. My concern is that rear element will snag/ move bellows and it sounds like it does.

    What else in that focal range is worth looking at?

    I' d like it to do dual duty on Crown and monorail is that untrainable

  6. #6
    Octogenarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Frisco, Texas
    Posts
    3,526

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    Check out the Fujinon 125W, 125 CM-W, or the Nikon/Nikkor 135W.

    Either of these lenses would fit the Crown very nicely.

    No problem using them on a monorail as well.

  7. #7
    Large Format Rocks ImSoNegative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    McCaysville Georgia
    Posts
    1,600

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    i had a 53mm SA i used on my 2x3 crown, i had to take the GG off and screw in the real element that way, worked great though, the nikor 120 f8 is an awsome lens, i was looking at one as well for my 8x10. good luck
    "WOW! Now thats a big camera. By the way, how many megapixels is that thing?"

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    7,871

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Kerner View Post
    So you take the ground glass out each time you want to use the lens?
    Bob, my Graphics have Graflok backs. Their focusing panels have to be removed to attach a roll holder. They come off easily, just press the two chromed bars and slide the assembly to the right.

    Does your Crown have a Graflok or a Graphic (spring) back?

    Cheers,

    Dan

  9. #9
    Stefan
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    467

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    I'd look at one of the Fuji F5.6 plasmats (N, NW, CM-W), 125 or 135mm. These have image circles of 204 and 211mm respectively, highest among the F5.6 plasmats in those focal lenghts. Compared to the Nikon 120SW, they are much smaller, lighter, will fold inside the Crown, no problems mounting, one stop faster, cheaper, and will allow you to use the limited movements that the Crown offer.

    They cost 150-250$ used, so get one and stick it on your Crown, and if needed get another lens for your monorail without needing to take the Crown limitations into consideration. Mounting the rear element though the back is probably a good way to wear out the fine threads on the element/shutter.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    89

    Re: Nikon 120 f8 SW in Crown Graphic

    The Nikon 120 SW rear element does not fit through the hole in the front standard of a 4x5 Pacemaker Graphic. As others have said it could be mounted by removing the ground glass and fitting the rear element through the back of the camera, but why would you want to use a lens with that much coverage on a Graphic with such limited movements?

    The Nikon 120 SW would be good on your mono rail. Get something else for the Graphic. There's nothing wrong with the standard issue for Graphics, the Kodak Ektar 127mm.

Similar Threads

  1. Accuracy of Crown Graphic Top Rangefinder
    By Frank Petronio in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 9-Nov-2007, 03:42
  2. Nikon 8000, Vuescan and long 120 negatives
    By David Swinnard in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-Mar-2006, 21:51
  3. Crown Graphic Lens and Flash Questions
    By Greg Lawhon in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 4-Dec-2000, 22:59
  4. Advice on Crown Graphic and a 90mm lens
    By Peter Lowe in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5-Mar-1998, 13:08

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •