Page 96 of 98 FirstFirst ... 46869495969798 LastLast
Results 951 to 960 of 979

Thread: 6x17 Images

  1. #951

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    2,004

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Quote Originally Posted by panoral View Post
    Beautiful composition.
    Thank you.

  2. #952

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Washougal, Washington
    Posts
    550

    Re: 6x17 Images

    . . Sticklepath. Devon, England
    . . Sticklepath. Devon, England by Reinhold S., on Flickr. . Neg# TVUK 121. Fuji G617, 105mm, Yg filter, FP4 film. 1994

    Reinhold

  3. #953

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    2,004

    Re: 6x17 Images

    HP5+


    Bandon Beach, Oregon by tuco, on Flickr

  4. #954
    Mohammad Reza Alvandi panoral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Iran
    Posts
    219

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Iran, Panoral 617 camera, Schneider Super Angulon 75/5.6, Schneider IIIC center filter, Hoya red filter, Kodak Tmax 100, 6x17 roll film


  5. #955
    Scyg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Chicago, IL, USA
    Posts
    100

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Very, very nice.

  6. #956

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    2,004

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Quote Originally Posted by Scyg View Post
    Very, very nice.
    Thank you.

  7. #957

    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Northlake, TX
    Posts
    50

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    HP5+


    Bandon Beach, Oregon by tuco, on Flickr
    Great processing...for HP5+, I don't see any hint of graininess whatsoever. Can I ask your technique?

  8. #958

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    2,004

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Quote Originally Posted by 6X17 Shooter View Post
    Great processing...for HP5+, I don't see any hint of graininess whatsoever. Can I ask your technique?
    Thanks. I don't do anything special for finer grain. Sometimes it's more noticeable than others. I think negative size and scaling the image down by an order of magnitude from the scanned size is the main factor. When I use Delta 3200, for instance, I see less grain on posted images from a 6x17 negative than a 6x9.

  9. #959

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arlington, Texas
    Posts
    204

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Kodak Panoram Lone Road by rrunnertexas, on Flickr

    Driving through Colorado and stopped in a beautiful place. Kodak Panoram no 1 loaded with Provia.

  10. #960

    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Northlake, TX
    Posts
    50

    Re: 6x17 Images

    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Thanks. I don't do anything special for finer grain. Sometimes it's more noticeable than others. I think negative size and scaling the image down by an order of magnitude from the scanned size is the main factor. When I use Delta 3200, for instance, I see less grain on posted images from a 6x17 negative than a 6x9.
    Thanks for responding. When it gets really noticeable, I've been experimenting with luminosity and channel masks and using a very slight blur effect on certain images that lend itself to that (such as your seascape scene) to smooth things out a bit.

Similar Threads

  1. Help with compression research (Need sample images)
    By schngrg in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-Jan-2007, 22:09
  2. Help with displaying website images
    By Stephen Willard in forum On Photography
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 19-Jan-2007, 23:35
  3. What to do with my 6x17 negs?
    By austin granger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2-Oct-2004, 15:06

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •