Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    12

    B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Just returned from an exhibition at USC in Los Angeles entitled "Karsh: Regarding Heroes." The exhibit features 100 of Yousuf Karsh's portraits of world renowned luminaries.

    Although I've read extensively about Karsh's work in the studio, it seems that very little has been written about his trademark darkroom and print finishing techniques. For instance, how does he achieve such depth and luminosity in his portraits? Is this a function of retouching B&W negatives? And the incredible tonality of his prints; is this readily achievable using today's B&W emulsions?

    Thoughts, insights?

  2. #2
    Big Negs Rock!
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    1,188

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Where is the exhibit? I'd like to go.
    Mark Woods

    Large Format B&W
    Cinematography Mentor at the American Film Institute
    Past President of the Pasadena Society of Artists
    Director of Photography
    Pasadena, CA
    www.markwoods.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    12

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Fisher Museum of Art, University of Southern California. May also be known as Fisher Art Gallery or Fisher Art Museum.

  4. #4
    Big Negs Rock!
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Pasadena
    Posts
    1,188

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Thank you. I googled it and it looks great! Thanks for the heads up. BTW, the luminosity you see is most likely the reflection of the strobe sources on the face. This is something we try to avoid in motion pictures, but Karsh used to great effect -- no powder for his subjects, at least no SOP. :-)
    Mark Woods

    Large Format B&W
    Cinematography Mentor at the American Film Institute
    Past President of the Pasadena Society of Artists
    Director of Photography
    Pasadena, CA
    www.markwoods.com

  5. #5
    multiplex
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    5,356

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    hi FLC

    it is possible to get similar results using modern films and papers.
    i worked for someone who made similar portraits. she shot everything on
    tri x and tri x ortho, i processed everything in dk50 ( deeptank/hangers + replenished )
    and printed everything on ilford paper processed in dektol.
    everything was retouched with leads / graphite ..
    sometimes prints were knife etched, sometimes they were dusted with graphite ...

    this was in the 1980s ...

    sometimes to get brilliant shine / highlights vaseline was used ...

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    It's a lot more about the lighting than the materials. You could do it with digital even ;-)

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hamilton, Canada
    Posts
    1,881

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Karsh never used strobes:just tungsten lights and yes retouching plays a huge part. His biography has an unretouched example of Churchill and the finished print. This shows how the use of retouching creates the highlights. See
    The Life of Yousuf Karsh: Portrait in Light and Shadow
    Author: Maria Tippett
    There is a discussion of his developing techiques in that book, Developer, paper etc. He did develop by inspection to a thinner than expected negative.
    Regards
    Bill
    Last edited by cowanw; 28-Sep-2010 at 05:27.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,015

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Quote Originally Posted by FLC View Post
    Just returned from an exhibition at USC in Los Angeles entitled "Karsh: Regarding Heroes." The exhibit features 100 of Yousuf Karsh's portraits of world renowned luminaries.

    Although I've read extensively about Karsh's work in the studio, it seems that very little has been written about his trademark darkroom and print finishing techniques. For instance, how does he achieve such depth and luminosity in his portraits? Is this a function of retouching B&W negatives? And the incredible tonality of his prints; is this readily achievable using today's B&W emulsions?

    Thoughts, insights?
    I think the short answer is that yes, these things are possible. Today's b&w emulsions are probably better than what was available to him. It's mostly lighting.

    To me, Irving Penn's pictures blow Karsh's out of the water. And he was making a lot of contact prints, which offer a lot less room for manipulation. Also I recently saw a bunch of Avedon's 8x10 contact prints at the MFA in Boston, and they were straight up amazing too.

  9. #9
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,338

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    I always thought he used hot lights, maybe fresnels just like the movie sets. The prints themselves - maybe at one point a relatively cold-toned DuPont paper and typical MQ developer. The effect is easily replicated with some of today's papers,
    especially with a little gold toner to cool the final image a bit.

  10. #10
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,338

    Re: B&W print quality: What was Karsh's darkroom and finishing technique?

    Sully - I don't get the comparison to either Penn or Avedon. Karsh was after a completely different look, a lot more direct, and a fairly direct contrasty silver print
    suited his personal style superbly. Just can't imagine someone like Winston Churchill
    being commemorated by Avedon's capricious high-jinks, or Penn's soft fashion touch.
    The direct, acutely-focussed glare, printed good and hard, was just the touch needed
    by history.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •