View Poll Results: Which 210 for 4x5

Voters
67. You may not vote on this poll
  • 210/5.6 Fujinon-W

    23 34.33%
  • 210/5.6 Sironar-N MC

    19 28.36%
  • 210/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    30 44.78%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 59

Thread: Picking a 210 for 4X5

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    4,854

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Didn't one of the LF saints tell us we needed a 210... either St. Ansel or St. Fred the Picker. Isn't that really why there are so many onthe market?

    Which one probably doesn't matter. I chose mine using the eenie-meenie-mynie-moe method and ended up with Schneider. I remember lots of talk of Schneider being lower contrast than Nikon and Fuji having a reddish color cast... but never noticed these differences myself. If I knew at the time that Nikon had 67mm filters I might have gone that way.

  2. #42
    jp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    5,253

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    I like my 203mm optar.

    I'm sure you can't go wrong with any of the poll choices either. I have a fujinon and a symmar-s in other focal lengths and they are well made.

  3. #43
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    13,879

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Brian, 210 was pushed by some of the pro photo schools for its versatility. If a student
    had one of these for portraiture and general use, and a 90 for architecture, they had
    most applications covered with a minimal investment. Plus a 210 has a much better image circle than most "normal" lenses like a 150. In fact, it came to be regarded as
    "normal" by many 4x5 users. I certainly regarded it that way, and liked the angle of
    perspective too, although now I consider 250 more as my personal "normal".

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,337

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Quote Originally Posted by Van Camper View Post
    In 35mm terms, you can divide that by 3, so it is very slight difference.
    14% is 14%

    (240-210)/210 = (80-70)/70


  5. #45
    In the desert...
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nevada/N.Arizona/ Florida Keys
    Posts
    562

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Quote Originally Posted by rdenney View Post
    Not my point (though the 210 isn't even that long relative to the format--it's more like a 60). The 210 is the standard "longer" lens for 4x5 use (probably because so many were available, given that they are normal lenses for 5x7). The 135 was the standard accessory long lens for small format. Thus, both were have been produced in quantity relative to their markets, and offered at relatively low price points. Also, both are long enough to be "long", but not long enough to require a telephoto design. That has the double-pronged benefit of not requiring much coverage and not including elements that magnify faults.

    Most people add a 210 to their 4x5 collection using the same basic motivations as people adding a 135mm lens to their 35mm collection.

    The equivalent focal length to a 135 would be something like a 450, which is rare and expensive for 4x5 use, and which commonly requires a telephoto design to work on a 4x5 camera. 4x5 users think hard before buying one, and in that format it's a specialty lens, not the default long lens.

    (I should add that the only reason there are sucky 85's is because they push the limits in terms of speed. Most cheapie 135's are f/2.8-f/4 lenses, just as most 210's start at f/5.6 or smaller. There are probably no bad 85/2.8's, but most 85's are f/2 or faster, and are considered more of a specialty portrait lens than an accessory telephoto.)

    Rick "thinking in market terms" Denney
    Rick, You are right, mom always said I wasn't mathematically inclined! She was right. I have the Sironar 210 and have been very pleased with it. I have also used it on my 8 x 10 Wista but even the slightest movements and it tends to loose the corners. It is fine for 5 x 7. 215 mm paragons are out there cheap at times and they also have good coverage but I don t think they are a coated lens.

  6. #46
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    5,324

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Wooten View Post
    215 mm paragons are out there cheap at times and they also have good coverage but I don t think they are a coated lens.
    Yes, they are coated. I have an 8-1/2" Paragon in the fast f/4.5 version. It's a tessar design and a nice lens for many applications. It can go sharp or soft, and the bokeh is not bad. They are big, though, for their format, being mounted in an Ilex No. 4.

    Rick "who has tasked the Paragon as a portrait lens for the Speed Graphic, and will calibrate the Kalart for it once all the right pieces are collected" Denney

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    726

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    210 or 240 G-Claron

  8. #48
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    7,477

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Just to toss another lens into the ring, I used a Computar Symmetrigon 210/6.3 (Copol 1) that was very sharp and came with a nice metal lens shade. I used it for 4x5 and 5x7. It got ripped off with the rest of my 5x7 gear back in 1995. But I recently bought another 5x7, and another Symmetrigon that I just mounted on a lens board -- so I will see if it will match the sharpness of my old one.

    Vaughn

  9. #49

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    I would rather suggest a Nikkor-M 200mm f8.0 instead of much larger 210mm choices. After using a 210mm for a little while, I now find that my longest normally used lens is a 180mm f5.6, and the 210mm sits unused much of the time. So my reasoning behind the 200mm Nikkor is that it takes up very little room in a bag, and it is a really good lens.

    Ciao!

    Gordon Moat Photography

  10. #50
    Thalmees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    342

    Re: Picking a 210 for 4X5

    Quote Originally Posted by Thalmees View Post
    Really do not know why more votes went to 210/5.6 Fujinon-W ? compared to 210/5.6 Symmar-S MC ?
    Thanks for any comment.
    [IMG]

    Now Thing are more logic.
    Still my query has no answer !!!
    Appreciate any input.

Similar Threads

  1. Wollensak 210 vs G-claron 210 for 8x10
    By Luca Merlo in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-Sep-2007, 10:55
  2. A 210 is a 210 is a 210...NOT!
    By Chauncey Walden in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2-May-2007, 11:05
  3. Lens image circle to cover 4x10
    By Vui Shin Chong in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-Dec-2005, 08:18
  4. Cheap lenses for 5x7? 215mm Caltar?
    By John Kasaian in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16-Aug-2005, 19:12
  5. Which 210 view lens
    By Ron_673 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6-Jul-1999, 18:58

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •