Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

  1. #1

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    I'm relatively new to LF, so I'm still trying to figure out what lenses I should buy. Most of my shots will be landscape/outdoors.

    I currently have a 90mm and 150mm, but I'm wondering if I should get a 210 also. I've found a used 210mm Caltar II-E on the internet for what looks like a grea t price, but haven't been able to find any info on the lens. I've also seen a C altar II-N for a couple hundred more.

    Other than the max aperture on the II-N, what's different? I assume it's a newe r model and perhaps made by a different manufacturer. Would the II-N be worth s pending more money?

    Thanks a lot,

    Jason

  2. #2
    Lost mike rosenlof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Location
    Louisville, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    324

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    The Caltar II-E is, if I remember correctly, a four element lens. They may be slower than the N models and they will have a smaller coverage circle. They are also probably smaller and lighter than the six element II-N models. Except for at the widest aperture or two, the E is probably not visibly less sharp than the N.

    Caltar lenses are currently made by Rodenstock. Or they were the last time I cared to look.

  3. #3

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    I believe, but don't hold me to this, that the Caltar II-E is a Rodenstock Geronar 210/6.8 three element lens with 242 mm coverage.

    The Caltar II-N is a Rodenstock Sironar (Sironar-N?) 210/5.6 six element four group lens wtih 301 mm coverage.

    I've found Calumet to be very helpful with things like this. If you go to their web site you can search for "Caltar II-N" and "Caltar II- E" and see the info.

    Hopefully Bob Salomon can clarify this more.

    DW

  4. #4

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    From Calumet web site:

    210 f/6.8 Caltar II-E

    Type of Shutter: Copal 1 Aperture Range: 6.8-64 Lens Configuration: 3 elements and 3 groups lange Focal Distance: 195mm Filter Size: 49mm Image Circle @f/22: 242mm Angle of Coverage: 60 degrees Maximum Format: 5x7

  5. #5
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,954

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    Jason,

    I have the 210mm Caltar II-E. I bought it on sale last year. When I questioned the Calumet employee about the quality of the lens, he said that I would be pleasantly surprised at the quality of this lens. He was right. I have been very happy with it. Images are sharp, colors good. Good contrast. It is small and very light. If you don't need the extra movements of the II-N, and it sounds like you don't, the II-E is a very nice lens for landscaping. Don't worry about it being only 3 elements. A lot of very nice photos were made with 3 elelment lenses, and these have the added advantage of multicoating.

    Only one suggestion. If you have enough bellows, you might want to consider going longer than 210mm. It will cost you though.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    373

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    Since you're shooting outdoors, consider the weight of the lenses. The II-N is probably almost twice the weight of (as well as physically bigger than) the II-E.

  7. #7

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    I own the E lens and find it to be excellant,a nice all around lens.You have to realize this lens is designed to be used at F22 though!I shoot architecture & landscapes with mine.BTW,a 210mm will allow you much greater movements than your shorter focals. I believe these are Rodenstock Geronars.

  8. #8

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    Thanks for everyone's help and advice. I just ordered the lens, and can't wait to get it.

    Thanks again!

    Jason

  9. #9
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,954

    Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    Jason,

    Enjoy photographing with it.

  10. #10

    Re: Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)

    Jason,

    After all these years do you still like the lens?

Similar Threads

  1. 210mm Dagor vs. 215mm Acuton/Caltar-S
    By William Mortensen in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19-Apr-2006, 16:26
  2. Caltar
    By Joe Hudgens in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 24-Sep-2005, 06:25
  3. caltar 210 f6.8
    By pete biro in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13-May-2002, 18:24
  4. Caltar 90 f8
    By Brian Legere in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Jul-2000, 15:53
  5. 90 f/8 Caltar WII
    By Don Sparks in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-May-2000, 22:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •