Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Why do the contact prints look so good?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    2

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    In looking at contact prints from some very good photographers who use 8x10 and 11x14 cameras I see their photos look so good. Much better than those with 35mm film and enlarged. I thought it would be the other way around with 35mm having the sharpest lenses and the newest film technologies.

  2. #2

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    ah but you have to enlarge the negative. When you enlarge you magnify not only the grain but the spaces between the grain, these spaces have no image and thus are called fog (non image forming exposure). when you contact print you minimize this effect and you get the wondeful texture and "feel" of what you are seeing. It is the reason why so many photographers still carry many punds of equipment just to take one or two photogrpahs. In addition when you contact print you minimize the lens failures and so many other factors that become more apparent when you enlarge a negative.

  3. #3

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    MaryAnne: There is a lot more to picture quality than sharpness and film technology. With LF, there is simply more room on the negative to register detail and tone. There is a smoothness with a LF contact that cannot be obtained from enlarging small negatives. Even a piece of junk lens on an 8x10 can give you remarkable contact prints. The modern 35mm cameras and lenses are certainly state of the art, but cannot make up for the small negative. 35mm has its place in photography, but ultimate print quality is not it.

    Regards,

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    255

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    MaryAnne,

    The new film technologies, as you describe, also apply to large format as well. Regarding lenses being better for 35mm; if one was to compress the image circle from a lens designed for a 4 X 5 format (for example) down to a 35mm format, I think you would find resolution per MM is as good as a 35mm lens....maybe better. As the others have stated, sharpness isn't everything....lack of grain and outstanding tonal quality also make large format better than smaller formats. I am always amazed at 19th century photos, many which are contact prints. The quality of some of the civil war photos makes my jaw drop!

    J. P. Mose

  5. #5
    Andy Eads
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Pasco, Washington - the dry side of the state
    Posts
    246

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    MaryAnne, When an negative is enlarged, it passes through yet one more optical system, the enlarger lens. All lenses have some degree of internal flare and abberations. The net effect is that the tone reproduction of the negative is compromised to some degree. A good enlarging system (light source, lens, safelight, light baffling, etc.) minimize these effects but will not eliminate them. A contact print, however, eliminates these optical effects. Borrowing from terminology that radio and TV people use, the signal to noise ratio in large format is much better than smaller formats. If you put a 35mm camera along side a 8x10 with lenses that cover the same field of view, the 8x10 will record the image on a detector that has nearly 50 times the area. That translates into 1/50th the grain and 50 times the information capacity. The signal (picture) to noise (grain, dust, etc.) ratio is 50 times better. It's like the difference between AM radio and FM: clarity frequency response and dynamic range. Even if the lens on the 8x10 were only half as sharp as the 35mm, you still have an enormous difference between the images. When you get the exposure and development of the negative just right, there is nothing that compares with the beauty of a good contact print.

  6. #6

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    Mary Anne:

    I am surprised no one has mentioned the Callier effect. It is a continuing source of argument among photogs.

    Ansel Adams used a flat light source as do many other LF types, including Kodak.

    Theory has it that light close to a source such as a condenser lens or a dichroic head loses definition when passing thru the relatively densly packed silver grains in highlights. This loses the subtlety and creaminess (i.e. smooth transition from light to dark in continous tone subjects) that comes from a contct print made with light that has travelled a foot or so from the source before passing thru the silver. Cold light heads- Zone VI from Calumet, Aristo among others reduce this effect even in 35mm.

    Some users of condenser enlargers claim it is all hogwash but I have seen in many times, thus explaining my move to 4x5 then 8x10 with contact prints. I also have a full battery of 35 & MF toys but large negs can NOT be beaten.

    New inkjet technology with dedicted software and five shades of grey plus black ink comes close.

    Adams "The Print" delves into this fully, as does Fred Picker's "Zone VI Workshop".

    Cheers

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    12

    Why do the contact prints look so good?

    You are comparing apples with oranges. There are many superb 35mm enlargements which can't be visually distinguished from 8x10 contact prints.

  8. #8

    Re: Why do the contact prints look so good?

    MaryAnne, one rule which you might think about is the 2x rule. A 4x5 enlarged to a max of 2x is 8x10. 5x7 at 2x a little less than 11x14 max size. What if your 35mm was enlarged to 2x? A very small print right? But the quality, what is the quality like? Try and see what the max size you can enlarge a 35mm to and still have the quality you desire. I did once and for me it was about 4.5x. It's a small print but for the quality I wanted that's what it was.

    Solution; larger negative format. A 645 makes a very very nice 5x7, then it goes up in size. When you get to the 5x7 format you will have the option to contact print or enlarge. The same is true with all sizes from there up. A 4x5 is about the absolute smallest print that is useful except in an album.
    If you like the quality then look for a larger format or make smaller prints.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    2,474

    Re: Why do the contact prints look so good?

    A wonderful question, in fact you're absolutely right - isn't it marvelous, almost incredible, that such a simple thing as a format size is even more important for the picture quality than "the sharpest lenses and the newest film technologies"?
    And by the way, nice to see you around, Jorge.

  10. #10
    Michael Alpert
    Guest

    Re: Why do the contact prints look so good?

    Although what you are stating about contact prints is quite accurate (contact prints do look sharper than many 35mm enlargements), all that clarity comes at the price of comfort and spontaneity. There are large-format photographers who frequently produce photographs that have the fluidity (if that's the right word) of images from smaller formats, but it is a push to get there.

Similar Threads

  1. Contact prints without a darkroom?
    By Calamity Jane in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2005, 13:43
  2. Contact prints aren't as sharp as the neg looks
    By Robert Skeoch in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 24-Aug-2004, 18:06
  3. Bergger BPF 200 in HC 110 D for contact prints
    By jyrki portin in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 8-Jun-2002, 15:05
  4. 5x7 contact prints
    By Urs Bernhard in forum Business
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 1-Oct-2001, 16:13
  5. What papers are good for contact printing, besides Azo?
    By William Marderness in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5-Jul-2001, 15:58

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •