I seem to be attracting interesting lenses in the semi-modern category. They are not old enough to have attracted much research or to interest those who appreciate lenses for their "personality", nor are they new enough to be fully described by modern advertising literature. That's why I'm describing them--to provide some help to later searchers like me.
The first was the 240/6.8 Caltar Type Y, ca. early 70's, which I have confirmed by inspection to be a Rodenstock Ysarex, following the Tessar formula, as suggested by Kerry Thalmann. Nice lens up to modern standards at the apertures we use, and in a #1 shutter instead of the #3 shutter used by f/5.6 lenses at this focal length.
The latest is the subject of this post. I have recently bought from Jan Pederson of this forum a 12" f/6.3 Ilex-Caltar, mounted in what seems to be a very late Acme No. 4 shutter. His posting, which includes an attached picture, is here. Looking at the Camera Eccentric website, I see them described in the 1965 and 1970 Calumet catalogs. Those catalogs describe it as an updated Tessar, and they were clearly trying to provide a lower-price alternative to the Commercial Ektars and more recent plasmats that they were also selling in those catalogs.
Here's an excerpt of the Calumet description:
In 1965, Calumet prices the 12" f/6.3 Caltar in a No. 4 Acme at $175.Originally Posted by 1965 Calumet Catalog
(The Series-S Caltar 300mm looks like a Rodenstock f/5.6 plasmat in a Copal shutter, probably from the first period of Rodenstock involvement in Caltar-branded lenses.) The 12" f/6.3 (model L-115) Caltar was $185 in 1970, compared to $370 for the 300/5.6 Type S and $416 for the 300/5.6 Symmar in the same catalog.Originally Posted by 1970 Calumet Catalog
In View Camera, Lynn Jones suggests that these were made by Ilex as part of a joint project with Burke and James, Calumet, and Ilex, and were sold as Paragons, Acutons, and Caltars. Dr. Jones includes it in this list:
http://www.austincc.edu/photo/pdf/usdlens.pdf
Here is the Vade Mecum description for this lens (their Q15 diagram is a classic Tessar, despite being described below as a triplet type--Kingslake insists that the Tessar did not derive from a triplet, but rather from a Zeiss Anastigmat):
In my digging, I found a reference that I can no longer remember or find suggesting that the special glass used in this project was lanthanum or other rare-earth glass. I don't have a Geiger counter but I do detect a very slight yellowing of the lens, which does nothing to refute this speculation. Dr. Jones would know, I'm sure.Originally Posted by Vade Mecum
In any case, this one looks like the pinnacle of Tessar technology and likely on a par with the Commercial Ektar, and it enjoys a very good reputation.
The shutter also interests me. The Acme No. 4 has all the typical Acme controls, including the separate flash sync cocking lever and timing control (for bulbs and electronic flash), and the press-focus feature. It is not self-cocking like the Universal No. 4 in which my 8-1/2" f/4.5 Paragon is mounted, which seems to have been made in the 50's. The labeling uses block lettering of a more modern design than the older shutter, and even has a little plastic handle on the aperture control lever. I have been unable to find any dating scheme for Ilex shutters, probably because nobody really cares, but this suggests to me a later design than the more traditional Ilex look shown even in the Calumet catalogs.
I have been using a Grimes flange as a retaining ring for the 8-1/2" Paragon, but I think I'll go ahead and mount the flange properly and then just screw these lenses in and out of the same Sinar board. Who knows? I might end up with more Ilex No. 4 shuttered lenses.
Rick "gathering information for future searches" Denney
Bookmarks