Thanks.
Randy, the lens is a 17" Copying Ektanon, f10 at f16.
I am really liking what x-ray film does for skin tones, though it perhaps shows too much--skin inconsistencies pop right out. However, learning retouching is also on my calendar.
Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear
WOW...I was trying to decide if I wanted to try some X film but this and SergeiR's work make me say yes!
Generalizations are made because they are Generally true...
Hi! This is a print from the negative or a digital output?
[QUOTE=mdarnton;1185327]Shot today. 8x10, Fuji Green in D23, 1:6, 12 min.
Just trying to be a 1965-vintage studio portrait photographer . . . .
I put a light pad* on the floor, and shot the neg on it with a Nikon D300 and 55/3.5 Micro-Nikkor. There's more resolution in the neg than that brought out, and possibly a bit of vibration in my copying setup, which isn't the same as the one I use for 35mm. I'm hoping there will be a V700/750/800/850 scanner under the Christmas tree this year so I can scan 8x10 negs, of which I have made only a couple, so far.
* http://www.amazon.com/Huion-Inches-A.../dp/B00J3NRAV2
Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear
Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear
Thanks guys, but i believe that most of credit is due to people who started all the experiments , although no longer posting here much - Jim is one of them to certainly be named
Bookmarks