Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Van Alstyne, Tx.
    Posts
    172

    FP4 underexposed by 3 stops


    wait, i messed up my info.

    ok retype:

    underexposed my FP4 by 3 stops, very embarassing!

    I made this post and was for no logical reason typing about pulling film.... I did see a black cat this morning!

    Maybe now that I have turned my FP4 into iso 800 film.... maybe that package of Microphen will be handy.

    Would be nice to save these shots, just 2 of them.

    reccomend some developers that wont turn the negatives into a grain blob ?

  2. #2
    joseph
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: "pulling" FP4

    That's a push, not a pull...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Van Alstyne, Tx.
    Posts
    172

    Re: "pulling" FP4

    yes. LOL. Monday, I blame Monday.

  4. #4
    joseph
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill NC
    Posts
    1,401

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    Microphen-
    I'm sure that wasn't on the list earlier-
    that should do it, but don't ask me about times...

    Though you could always underexpose another sheet, and do a test...

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Van Alstyne, Tx.
    Posts
    172

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    I do have some Microphen

    I looked at the massive development chart.

    You know what it said ?

    it said:

    "You Idiot!" LOL

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,736

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    Or perhaps you could try some Diafine? Either way, I would do a test with another couple of sheets (under)exposed in the same way and process one in Microphen, the other in Diafine and see which one gets you closer...

    P.S.

    I used to push FP4 (no plus!) in Microphen back in the 70's and I think I remember doing it at about 15 min... I have a feeling that in your case a good starting point might be 18-20 min. If that still comes out thin, you can try raising the temp to 72 F and go gentle on agitation.

    I hope you salvage your film.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    954

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    Try Rodinal 1:100 for 40 minutes with agitation every 30" for first 5 minutes, then every 10 minutes thereafter. You may get a bit of extra density on the edges but it should even out development in the center 95%. Test first.

  8. #8
    Octogenarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Frisco, Texas
    Posts
    3,532

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    Brian,

    12 minutes in Microphen at 70 degrees should give you a scannable negative.

    Microphen is a speed increasing developer (your name is Speed, isn't it?).

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Van Alstyne, Tx.
    Posts
    172

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    thanks for the suggestions

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    650

    Re: FP4 underexposed by 3 stops

    You can expect the image to be there, because exposure at 800 can be salvaged by long development in HC-110B. (Please don't ask me how I know this.....)

Similar Threads

  1. Processing woes with ancient FP4
    By George Hofmann in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-Sep-2008, 01:48
  2. Bad batches of Ilford FP4?
    By tim atherton in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 29-May-2007, 07:30
  3. Is Ilford FP4 and Photowarehouse Ultrafine ISO 125 Film Same Thing?
    By Andre Noble in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 5-Sep-2004, 12:12
  4. FP4 vs Tri-X
    By Dave_958 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2002, 23:26
  5. FP4 compared to Tri-X Professional?
    By Erik Asgeirsson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2001, 22:29

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •