I like this, Pali,
Cheers,
I like this, Pali,
Cheers,
Thank you Renato!
scheinfluger - thank you. I always saw Pentax as capable, but not particularly noteworthy. Like most makers, they usually have a lens that hits it way out of the park & it sounds like Pentax did w/ this 50. What better lens do do it with? If I'm understanding Scott correctly, he has adapted that lens to a Canon digital? I don't know if anyone would know if this is possible also to a Nikon mount? Would it be worth it? 'Makes me wonder if some of the 6x7 lens are favorably comparable to the zeiss glass for the 'blad - to get a similar satisfaction w/ MF.
Hiho, Yes the pentax, super takumar 50/1.4. I have it mounted on the 5D with an adapter. The only downside is the mirror hits at infinity so I have to back off a tad. But I mostly shoot close up stuff with it.
Wicked nice results, Scott. 'Not just these recent ones.
When I see 35mm that looks outstanding, I keep wanting to hone my work w/ 35. 'A bit more demanding 'cause any imperfection is writ large.
You've learned to do alot of stuff right to get such consistent results. There's not many guys that do that w/ 35.
Found some interesting textures while visiting with a friend yesterday.
Shot on my Samsung Galaxy S4 (phone), b/w conversion done on my computer, however.
I printed this out to it's native size, 5x10" @300dpi, and it looks pretty good. NOT actual "camera quality", but I might have to return with an actual film camera and shoot a few more frames of this.
Stone Photo Gear
https://www.stonephotogear.com/
HP5 HC-110 semi 500cm
Bookmarks