hallo everbody
I?ve got a problem that could?n been resolved by either the kodak national pro s upport, or the kodak world support, its unbelivable, but after more than two hours surfing, calling, etc, I know as much as I did before. -->They just don?t care !
For some fast, handheld shootings of architecture, I?ve the choice between SLR a nd 6/9. When using Neg films as the Portra, I have these two options: either SLR with p ortra 160 NC, or the 6/9 (120) Portra 400 VC (as these lens need more speed)
The question: In which way will I have the best resolution, (lines per mm) negat ive, for scanning afterwards ?? (Therefore the Kodak print grain index (diffusor enlarger) doesn?t helps.)
Is the 400 VC instead of the 400 NC a good choice, to compensate the lower contr ast of the 400 ??
Thanks for your help.
Bookmarks