Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 155

Thread: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Just as a point of interest, what is the true optical resolution of the Cezanne Elite when scanning 4X5" film?

    Sandy King

  2. #22
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Hi Sandy,

    I own the regular Cezanne, not the elite, and unfortunately I don't have access to the appropriate resolution test slide. Which one do you recommend?

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Pete,

    No idea. I tried to find the answer to my question by looking at Cezanne Elite specifications on the web and came up dry. All I know is that while the maximum optical resolution of the Cezanne Elite is 5300 dpi it can only scan at this resolution in a relatively small strip, about 1 1/2" or 2" wide I believe. To scan anything wider the Cezanne has to reposition the lens and place it farther from the CCD, which results in less optical resolution. I am guessing that the maximum true otical resolution for 4X5" is 2400 dpi -3200 dpi but don't know for sure.

    Sandy




    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt View Post
    Hi Sandy,

    I own the regular Cezanne, not the elite, and unfortunately I don't have access to the appropriate resolution test slide. Which one do you recommend?

  4. #24
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Hi Sandy,

    You're right: 5300 spi is only for originals 1.5" wide. When I scan 4x5 one pass, I scan at 2400 spi. For two pass, which involves combining the two scans in Photoshop, I scan at 4000 spi, as I've not found any benefit from doing 3-pass scans at 5300 spi, with my materials and for my uses.

    I scan medium format at 4000 spi one pass, and 35mm at 5300 spi one pass.

    -Peter

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Wink Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt View Post
    But not the needed objectivity.
    How 'bout a "cage match" with Lenny Eiger and Michael Reichmann is a knock down drag out fight to the finish. We can judge if there is no knockout.

  6. #26
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Edmund Scientifics's variable frequency resolution target 5-200 lp/mm, stock # NT43-488, looks like it would be a good test subject, although since it's rigid, it'd be useless on a drum scanner. Oh, yeah, and it costs almost $500!

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Posts
    60

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    I'm certainly no expert in the matter, and don't have a dog in this fight, but I understand that the Aztec Premier drum scanner, used by Mr. Eiger and the company I use for my scans, Pixelnation, is one of, if not the best scanner on the market. One of its principal differences is that it captures scan sizes based on the size of the grain of the film, which results in sharper scans.

    I too would like to see a side by side comparison of the state of the art original digital source vs. the state of the art analog source. Perhaps Mr. Eiger will assist us, as this discussion is often entertaining, but does not often shed light.

    Rick Russell
    richardrussell-1@ca.rr.com

  8. #28

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    trying to escape Michigan and Illinois
    Posts
    373

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Quote Originally Posted by PenGun View Post
    How 'bout a "cage match" with Lenny Eiger and Michael Reichmann is a knock down drag out fight to the finish. We can judge if there is no knockout.

    Dude! You almost made me shoot coffee through my nose!

  9. #29
    Resident Heretic Bruce Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,362

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Russell View Post
    I'm certainly no expert in the matter, and don't have a dog in this fight, but I understand that the Aztec Premier drum scanner, used by Mr. Eiger and the company I use for my scans, Pixelnation, is one of, if not the best scanner on the market. One of its principal differences is that it captures scan sizes based on the size of the grain of the film, which results in sharper scans.
    I've always found this claim quite dubious. The size of the film grain clumps (dye clouds in color films) vary widely in most films used to capture real subjects with realistic subject brightness ranges. IOW, there is not one single size of the grain of the film -- film grain clump size is fairly stochastic (clump sizes increase generally with increasing density). And the scanner doesn't vary its aperture size as it scans - the aperture size is fixed. So the claim that the scanner "captures scan sizes based on the size of the grain of the film" (and yes, I realize it's not you making this claim, it's Aztek's marketing hype) is a non sequitur.

    More on what film grain is and what it actually looks like can be found in Tim Vitale's excellent paper on the subject.

    Bruce Watson

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    423

    Re: side by side comparison... large print digital back VS 4x5 color film

    I sent Michael an email.

    I yam a fight promoter today.

    Come on Lenny ... you'll crush the poor fool. Think what it would mean for your business.

Similar Threads

  1. "Digital 4x5"?
    By Eric Leppanen in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 18-Jul-2005, 22:59
  2. Grafmatic 6 sheets 4x5 film folder
    By NG Sai-kit in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25-Dec-2001, 11:18
  3. Digital printing 6x9 vs 4x5
    By Glenn Kroeger in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 22-Feb-2000, 13:42
  4. 4x5 best optics w/ Scheider HIGH END BACK sharper than 8x10?
    By Bill Glickman in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 17-May-1999, 04:31
  5. 4x5 digital camera back
    By Peter Tucker in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 26-May-1998, 15:30

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •