View Poll Results: Which lens for 5x7?

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • 180/5.6 Sironar (Plain ole' Sironar)

    0 0%
  • 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    10 100.00%
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 180/5.6 Sironar vs. 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    140

    180/5.6 Sironar vs. 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    Hi All,

    I'm trying to decide between these two lenses for use on 5x7:

    180/5.6 Sironar (Plain ole' Sironar)

    or

    180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    I shoot 99.9% B&W. I've searched the archives and cannot find anything to really set one apart from the other. Both seem to have excellent coverage #'s for 5x7 so short of flipping a coin or resorting to reading tea leaves can anyone recommend one over the other

  2. #2
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: 180/5.6 Sironar vs. 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    If it's one of the very early Sironar's then you take a risk they are prone to de-lamination. The coatings are excellent though and almost as good as Multi-coating. I have both a 150mm f5.6 Sironar and a 150mm f5.6 Sironar-N MC and in practice it's impossible to see a difference in the images.

    Personally I'd go for the more modern Symmar-S given your choice. My Sironar is de-laminating slightly.

    Ian

  3. #3
    Octogenarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Frisco, Texas
    Posts
    3,532

    Re: 180/5.6 Sironar vs. 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    Look for a Caltar II-N f5.6 180, instead. It is a Rodenstock Sironar N that has been re-badged by Calumet and still available new. However, it is readily available used.

    The two lenses you are inquiring about are older lenses. May have shutters that need a CLA. Low priced at the beginning, but more expensive in the long run. The Caltar II-N is a modern lens that can be purchased used at a reasonable price.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: 180/5.6 Sironar vs. 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    "I've searched the archives and cannot find anything to really set one apart from the other".

    Cost, availability, weight, size, filter size, shutter size, number of blades in diaphragm ?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    9,487

    Re: 180/5.6 Sironar vs. 180/5.6 Symmar-S MC

    For the least trouble, the newer the better of either brand, in a black rim Copal with a black aperture pointer. For the smoothest yet sharp B&W image I'd look for an older Symmar-S in a older Compur shutter with more than 7 blades so it makes a round aperture, with the caveat that Compur parts are getting harder to come by.... For a bargain, look for a 1980s Caltar. I'd pass on the 1970s Sironar (non-N) unless you could inspect it for separation, as I've boughten two old Sironars and gotten screwed that way. The older 1970s Schneiders may have Schneideritis but they don't seem to fall apart as often.

    If you're patient you'll find all of them in the low $200s.

Similar Threads

  1. Symmar vs Sironar
    By mosndup in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23-Jan-2008, 13:35
  2. Super Symmar XL 110 / Apo Sironar S 135
    By Jon Warwick in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 20-Aug-2007, 16:59
  3. Apo symmar 240 vs/ 240symmar s
    By MarshallS in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 22-May-2007, 21:45

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •