Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Tachihara and Caltar SII

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    182

    Tachihara and Caltar SII

    Just wanted to say thanks again for all the info on Tachihara and the Caltar len ses. I purchased a Tachihara after some good advice (and reasonable cautions) from th is group, and paired it with an excellent used Caltar SII 210mm. Now another question ( can you believe it?) - I also use a B&J 5x7 that I have both 5x7 and 4x5 backs for, and a Gold Dagor 24 0mm - but I would like to get a longer lens that I can use on both cameras. The BJ has enough bellows for a 360mm, but the Tachihara is limited to <300mm. So a true tele would seem in order. I shoot mostly landscape/scenics and short-to-medium length wilderness shots.

    Any suggestions or advice would be appreciated.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    128

    Tachihara and Caltar SII

    Matt:

    I've used a Tachihara for many years with a Fujinon 300T Tele. I also have an old Wollensak 15" (380mm) Tele that I have used occasionally on the Tachi. The Fujinon works nicely for most situations, but there is a little limitation for close-up work with it. The Fuji is a sharp lens, but contrast is a bit lower than a normally configured 300. That's no major problem since that can be taken care of in the darkroom. As a matter of fact, that can be an advantage in high contrast lighting situations. The tele designs all have smaller image circles. I usually have had no problems with that, but it is important to check the corners of the groundglass and make sure the entire neg will be covered. The Wolly isn't nearly as sharp as the Fuji, and the Wolly weighs a ton, making it really too heavy for the Tachi. Fujinon also has a 400T Tele, but I have never used one.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,695

    Tachihara and Caltar SII

    I used the Fuji 400T on my Tachihara for several years and it worked very well. The lens was sharp and at that focal length I seldom needed any siginificant movements. It's also relatively small (Copal 1 shutter) for a 400mm lens. They are fairly expensive, around $1,200 four or so years ago if I remember correctly. You seldom see them used, which I guess means either they don't sell many or the ones they do sell are in the hands of happy owners.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

Similar Threads

  1. Caltar II-E vs Caltar II-N (210mm)
    By Jason Syring in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5-Nov-2006, 11:31
  2. Caltar
    By Joe Hudgens in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 24-Sep-2005, 06:25
  3. caltar 210 f6.8
    By pete biro in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13-May-2002, 18:24
  4. Caltar 90 f8
    By Brian Legere in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Jul-2000, 15:53
  5. 90 f/8 Caltar WII
    By Don Sparks in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-May-2000, 22:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •