Originally Posted by
Dan Fromm
John, it depends on the lens.
On 2x3, f/9 Apo Nikkors (305, 420, 480) are all usable from f/9 down; 210/9 Konica Hexanon GRII is usable from f/9 down, noticeably better at f/11; 150/9 Apo Ronar is usable wide open, doesn't improve much on stopping down; f/10 Apo Saphirs (135, 180, 240, 300, 360) are all usable from f/10 down, better at f/16; 260/10 Nikkor-Q (= Process Nikkor) is usable wide open, better at f/16; f/9 TTH process tessars (6" Cooke Copying, 10.16" Taylor Hobson Copying, 30 cm Apotal) are usable wide open, better at f/16. 210/7.7 Beryl S, not really a process lens even though sold for use in copy machines, is usable wide open, better at f/16. All of these are worse at f/22 than at f/16.
14"/10 Wray Process Lustrar Ser. II is usable only at f/22 and smaller, I don't use it at all.
I've tried three 240/9 dagor type G-Clarons, two 210/9 Apo Gerogons on 35 mm. All are fine wide open.
John, everyone says that process lenses are made to be used at f/22. This because residual aberrations and field curvature are pretty well gone at f/22. I think it comes down to a question of coverage.
For me, wide open is usually ok unless I need to stop down to get more depth of field but that's because my applications don't need much coverage. I suspect that if the format's diagonal is near the lens' focal length then sharpness in the corners will be usefully better at f/22 than wide open.
If we're lucky, Joerg Krusche will report on his process lenses. AFAIK, he has more process lenses than the rest of us put together.
Bookmarks