Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Open vs Closed tray

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Windsor, UK
    Posts
    128

    Open vs Closed tray

    So far I have developed most of my film (4x5, and 8x10) in a Paterson Orbital daylight tank. It works great for 4x5, a bit more tough for 8x10 but overall the development times I get are consistent.
    I use Barry Thornston (Metol) 2 bath and 5:5 gives me great result, and I can push to 10:5 or even 12:5 for 'alt process' bulletproof density.

    Recently I equiped with IR goggles with the goal of 1) being able to tray develop and therefore do more sheets at a time 2) inspect.

    I can "inspect" allright, however it turns out that using the same developer, I have to /at least/ double the times to get any density at all. 10:5 will give me an "OK" neg bu nowhere near the density I get in the Orbital.

    Anyone has an idea why ? I 'agitate' by moving the neg from the bottom of the 'stack' to the top every minute or so... the temperatures are roughtly the same (Barry's is pretty consistent regardless of temperature anyway) and I really don't know why the tray development could make such a difference.

    And yes, I use 940nm illumination and the eyepiece is covered...

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sillycon Valley, CA
    Posts
    268

    Re: Open vs Closed tray

    Quote Originally Posted by buze View Post
    Anyone has an idea why ? I 'agitate' by moving the neg from the bottom of the 'stack' to the top every minute or so...
    I thought in tray developing film that you needed to shuffle the sheets and agitate constantly.

    -Darren

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    643

    Re: Open vs Closed tray

    I'm not familiar with the Thornton developer, but you might consider whether or not you are processing the same ratio of film area to developing agent in the two methods. It is possible that you are exhausting the first-bath agent to a greater extent when tray developing.

    Also, if your darkroom has low humidity, the open tray will cool dramatically due to evaporation, and this will slow any developer down (by reducing the uptake in the first bath, or by slowing the development reaction in the second bath, or both).

    You could check both of these issues by developing a single sheet in tray, covering the tray with plastic wrap during development, and agitating by lift-and-tilt. If the numbers go back to normal, do another sheet with less solution (comparable to its share of a multi-sheet batch) and narrow down from there.

    If a single sheet in a closed environment still takes double time, then suspect contamination from the tray, hope for a reply from someone with a better idea, or both!

    Good luck!

  4. #4

    Re: Open vs Closed tray

    you should continuously agitate by shuffling from top to bottom throughout the entire cycle, especially if you are attempting more than two or three sheets at a time.

  5. #5
    Dave Karp
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    2,954

    Re: Open vs Closed tray

    I use Thornton's formula in trays, but with a slosher. This way, all of the sheets are always in full contact with the developer. I believe that the others are correct. You need to shuffle more.

    In the A bath, you need to make sure that the emulsion soaks up the developing agent. If it is in contact with another sheet, this might inhibit this process.

    Then, when you move the sheets into the B bath, you must make sure that the emulsion is receiving fresh activator. Again, if the emulsion is in contact with the sheet on top of it, this is probably inhibiting the process. I think this would be the reason that your developing times have increased.

    For what it is worth, I always develop for 5 minutes in A, 5 minutes in B. With the slosher, I agitate for the first 30 seconds in each bath, then for ten seconds each minute. If I was using trays and shuffling I would try to shuffle continuously. I prefer the slosher to avoid scratches.

Similar Threads

  1. 90/4.5 Grandagon N - Sharp wide open?
    By vincent Martin in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 20-Sep-2006, 12:41
  2. Need help with using Tray siphons for final wash
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-Mar-2006, 10:10
  3. sheet film tray washing
    By Carl Weese in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4-May-2002, 09:02
  4. Alternative technique in tray processing
    By John Welton in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 8-Dec-2000, 23:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •