Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    I've owned a Tachihara, a Shen-Hao, and now a Chamonix. The Chamonix weighs about what the Tachihara weighs (2 lbs lighter than the Shen Hao), has a longer bellows extension than either camera (about 15" vs 13" for the Tachihara and 12" for the Shen Hao unless you fiddle around with base and axis tilt on the Shen Hao to extend the bellows beyond the camera bed, which gains another 2" but which is a PITA to do and probably isn't very sturdy with a larger lens), has front axis tilt (vs base tilt only for the Tachihara and base + axis tilt for the Shen Hao but I didn't find it very easy to switch to axis tilt on the Shen Hao), has tripod sockets for both 1/4" and 3/8" tripod screw sizes (vs 1/4" only on the Tachihara and I don't remember on the Shen Hao), has a viewing screen that seems about the same as the Tachihara and Shen Hao (i.e. not as good IMHO as a Maxwell but pretty good), has bubbles for leveling and zeroing the front and back forward and backward and side-to-side (the Tachihara has no bubble levels, I don't remember the Shen Hao), comes in a very nice carrying cloth and with a ground glass protector (the Tachihara and Shen Hao have neither), and FWIW is IMHO a nicer looking camera.

    My only complaints about the Chamonix after minimal usage are that there's no way to "stop" the back when raising it to make sure it's perpendicular to the camera bed other than by looking at the back bubble level as you place the camera back into position (or if there is I haven't found it). It also has kind of a "floppy" feel to it until it's set up and everything is locked down. By that I mean that unlike most wood field cameras the front standard isn't attached to the camera bed with a strut and knob. So when you first open the camera it's free to move up, down, and all around until you put the front standard in one of the holes in the bed. I also find the position of the control for locking and unlocking front tilt a little awkward. I haven't had any trouble adjusting to the position of the focusing knob.

    My complaints are minor compared to what for me are the advantages of the Chamonix (mainly the longer bellows and front axis tilt) and at this point I prefer the Chamonix to either the Tachihara or the Shen Hao though it does cost about $100 more with shipping from China. I wouldn't take the "six month wait" as gospel without checking with Hugo. I received mine about two weeks after ordering it.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  2. #22

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    Almost three years with my Shen-Hao HZX45A-II. The only changes I made were to add a Satin Snow ground glass, and I made a wooden ground glass protector. I did move the rear locking lever to the other threaded hole, since I found it easier to pull to lock than push to lock that down. I use the rear movements quite often, so I don't know that I would find other similarly priced cameras as useful. I bought my Shen-Hao through Badger Graphic Sales in Wisconsin.

    Ciao!

    Gordon Moat Photography

  3. #23
    grumpy & miserable Joseph O'Neil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    830

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Biggerstaff View Post
    Chances are your first camera will not be your last.
    -snip-

    Now isn't that the truth. In the past 12 years I've wandered through 6 different 4x5s, some of which I still have and use. However, if I popped back in tie 12 years ago and told myself i would go through that many cameras, no way I would believe it.

    I suspect your choice will be highly influenced by what is actually available to you when you are ready to buy. I ended up buying a rosewood Tachihara for an $100 from Badger because that's all they had in stock at that time, but I've never looked back.

    I've never used the Chamonix myself, but the one thing I can tell you is that the price of used wood field cameras in good shape, especailly on flea-bay, can be rather high, so there's an advantage to buying new, even if there is a wait.
    good luck
    joe
    eta gosha maaba, aaniish gaa zhiwebiziyin ?

  4. #24

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,031

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    I know I'm a heretic, but I still subscribe to the philosophy that a camera -- any camera -- is simply a light-tight box, with a lens at one end and film at the other end.

    If I were buying a new field camera today, I'd seriously consider the Chamonix, along with the Shen Hao, Tachihara, Walker and a few others. It really comes down to which camera you connect with...

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,498

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ellis View Post
    ...
    My only complaints about the Chamonix after minimal usage are that there's no way to "stop" the back when raising it to make sure it's perpendicular to the camera bed other than by looking at the back bubble level as you place the camera back into position (or if there is I haven't found it).
    Brian-- If you slide out the two tabs on the bottom of the rear standard the back will stop exactly perpendicular to the bed. You're not the only one who missed that.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,074

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryS View Post
    Brian-- If you slide out the two tabs on the bottom of the rear standard the back will stop exactly perpendicular to the bed. You're not the only one who missed that.
    Barry,

    Could you post a photo showing the tabs. It might allay a lot of fears! There have been a number of reports of difficulty here and your report is most helpful!

    Asher

  7. #27

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Houston, Texas USA
    Posts
    7

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    I have a chamonix 4X5 and for the first time using it was not aware of the Tabs/Sliders on the back. I can confirm what Barry S has said they are there and work perfect. This is an amazing camera at this price point.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Santa Barbara
    Posts
    1,266

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    The tabs are little slide outs at the bottom of the rear standard. They work very well to square it up when setting up the camera. Slide them back in if you want to to some rear tilt.

    I took an awl and grooved the lines on the bottom plates, then painted them in with white paint. It makes it a lot easier to square up the camera in low light (which is what I shoot in most of the time).

    For the $$, the Cham is a very impressive camera. It is amazingly rigid. It is a little fiddly when setting up or when you have to adjust the front or rear when changing lenses. It slows me down, but not hideously.

    I used the 80mm SS with it with no problems at all. I have not yet tried my 58mm.

  9. #29
    Rafael Garcia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    Posts
    330

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    I assume it is fine to refer to other websites. The article at

    http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=178

    has good descriptions of the Chamonix controls, with photos. It includes photos of the tabs.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: Chamonix vs other <$1000 4X5 Field Cameras?

    Thanks Barry et al, I wondered why the grooved lines were on those "tabs," now I see why they're there. This is really an ingeniously-designed camera once you learn how to use everything.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

Similar Threads

  1. 4x5, is it worth it?
    By Robert_5479 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 11-Jul-2007, 17:37
  2. Classic or Contemporary 4x5 Field Camera
    By Scott Rosenberg in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 20-Jan-2004, 10:02
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 22-Sep-2003, 16:33
  4. Wood field cameras and long-term effects of humidity
    By Badris in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 4-Jun-2002, 08:18
  5. Graphite 4x5 & 8x10 field cameras
    By Don Canning in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-Aug-2000, 12:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •