Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

  1. #1

    advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    Hi there,

    I've tried searching through the threads, but it's a miasma, and I wonder if anyone could offer some distilled advice on the current best method to scan 8 x 10 transparencies at home.

    I'll be printing mural-sized fine art, but what i would like to do is be able to scan these images at home first, in order to get to know the file, before splurging for the expensive drum scans that will be used for the actual prints.

    Cheers
    Chris

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    1,653

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    I use an Epson V750 with Silverfast software, and a plate of anti-newton ring glass to scan my 8x10s. An Epson 4990 will work just as fine. The secret it the glass to keep the film flat.

    http://fpointinc.com/glass.htm
    When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

    http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Photography/index.html

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    267

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    >>An Epson 4990 will work just as fine<<

    I agree with Walter for some film sizes but when it comes to films like 8x10 that are so large they must be scanned off the scanner's glass, the V Series definitely has an edge because of the second lens which is supposed to be focused right at the glass bed level. The 4990 has one lens and a relatively large depth of field but it is a compromise in terms of focus.

    Doug
    ---
    www.BetterScanning.com

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Fisher View Post
    >>An Epson 4990 will work just as fine<<

    I agree with Walter for some film sizes but when it comes to films like 8x10 that are so large they must be scanned off the scanner's glass, the V Series definitely has an edge because of the second lens which is supposed to be focused right at the glass bed level. The 4990 has one lens and a relatively large depth of field but it is a compromise in terms of focus.

    Doug
    ---
    www.BetterScanning.com
    Hmmm. That's interesting. I've scanned a whole bunch of 8x10 b&w negatives on my 4990 and never noticed a problem with focus.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Portland, Maine
    Posts
    12

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    I've been using my i900 from Microtek where the light comes from the bottom so no scan through glass. Lately, I've started using Scanscience fluid on the glass carrier and getting exceptional results.

  6. #6
    Just waiting to be developed..
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New Rochelle, NY 10804
    Posts
    501

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    For the best quality scan, you will need a drum scan.
    I have scanned hundreds of 8x10 negs and chromes a year for various clients.
    I would try a local lab that has a drum scanner. It is amazing the amount of detail you can pull from an 8x10.
    If you cant find a local lab, please pm me.
    -Ian Mazursky
    www.ianmazursky.com Travel, Landscape, Portraits and my 12x20 diary
    PrePress Express

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Posts
    2,094

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    Quote Originally Posted by IanMazursky View Post
    I would try a local lab that has a drum scanner.
    If you cant find a local lab, please pm me.
    We also do 8x10's here. I agree a drum scan is the way to go. However, I don't think a local lab is the answer. Their business model is based upon paying someone very little and charging a lot for something. I think what you need is a relationship with an experienced scanner operator who will scan it the way you want it... The relationship is what makes things work.

    Lenny

    EigerStudios

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 1997
    Location
    Baraboo, Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,697

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    Quote Originally Posted by IanMazursky View Post
    For the best quality scan, you will need a drum scan.
    I have scanned hundreds of 8x10 negs and chromes a year for various clients.
    I would try a local lab that has a drum scanner. It is amazing the amount of detail you can pull from an 8x10.
    If you cant find a local lab, please pm me.
    Maybe you should try reading his message before you promote your business. He said he just wants to scan at home to get the file in shape, not to make his final murals.
    Brian Ellis
    Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be
    a mile away and you'll have their shoes.

  9. #9
    Kirk Gittings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico
    Posts
    9,864

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ellis View Post
    Hmmm. That's interesting. I've scanned a whole bunch of 8x10 b&w negatives on my 4990 and never noticed a problem with focus.
    Doug is absolutely right, the 4990's focus is fixed and optimized above the glass at the filmholder height, but the difference would only be noticeable on larger prints.
    Thanks,
    Kirk

    at age 73:
    "The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep"

  10. #10
    Ted Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,465

    Re: advice on scanning 8 x 10 transparencies

    To go back to Chris' original question. Virtually any of the current generation consumer flatbed scanners that have the size capability to handle 8x10 will work just fine for the intended use. the same also holds true for a number of previous generations of these scanners. Even some older scanners that can ow be found very inexpensively will do the job (e.g. UMax Powerlook III, Agfa Duoscan's, etc.)

Similar Threads

  1. Advice for scanning color negatives
    By Barry Trabitz in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 20-Oct-2007, 13:53
  2. Using BTZS with a scanning workflow, how to?
    By Ralf-Finn Hestoft in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28-Apr-2006, 09:18
  3. Scanning Workflow
    By neil poulsen in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8-Feb-2006, 11:05
  4. Duplicating 4x5 transparencies onto 120 film?
    By Roger Scott in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2004, 06:41
  5. Scanning color transparencies with a digital camera
    By QT Luong in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 8-Jan-2001, 10:00

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •