Wista 8x10, Kodak EPP, does every color image need to be super saturated?
Feel free to critique this image.
Wista 8x10, Kodak EPP, does every color image need to be super saturated?
Feel free to critique this image.
This is nice, I really like it. The natural split-lighting is terrific.
As a generic 'feel' image it's excellent. As a portrait of a particular dancer, I'd like to see more detail in her eyes ... they're kinda lost.
Can't wait to get a real scan because this one has enough noise in the shadows.Originally Posted by Ron Bose
Nice.
A little reflector fill to her face would improve it a bit.
(as Ron previously noted)
Joe,
Nice image. Do you want to start this as a new picture post of subtle color????
Rich
Beautiful! It illustrates perfectly that "less is more." So many color shots seem to shout, "Look at me! Aren't I colorful!" withiut any other reason for being. By using only as much color as necessary to make your statement about the form and beauty of the dancer and her surroundings, you've allowed the viewer to concentrate on what's most important, rather than being distracted by any extraneous elements. Bravo!!
yeah, add away, the more images the better
With a quallity scan I can get that however if you look close enough to the shadow side you will see it is distorted, that's how bad this scan is. That will be fixed at the end of September when I get a real scanner and scan the whole session which has some other very nice images in 8x10 and 35mm. Good story in the making of this image as well. It was a good experience.
OK Joe,
I did not want to intrude on someone else's thread. Photo Taken in 1995 of Mesa Arch, Sunrise in Canyonlands NP, UT. Image taken with Linhof Technikdardan 45 S, Rodenstock f6.8 75mm Grandagon N MC. Provia 100, exposure NR.
Rich
Rich, what made the red under the arch? And where was the sun relative to the camera?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks