Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: C-41 chemicals 3-step

  1. #1

    C-41 chemicals 3-step

    I'm thinking of processing color negative film in one of the Jobo automated processors that uses a three step process. (developer, blix, wash) I used Tetenal chemicals in the Jobo I owned years ago but Tetenal is no longer available in the U.S.

    Is anyone doing three step C-41 and if so, what chemicals are you using?

    What chemicals is anyone in the U.S. using for C-41, whatever the version?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2005

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step

    Have a look at this thread Henry:

  3. #3

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step

    Good info there -- but I wonder about how to come up with a bleach/fix combination? I'm looking for convenience from the processing machine.

    I could set up a little tank line but there's not much room in my little darkroom - not enough to leave it set up and at that point its too much hassle to set it up everytime I want to run film.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Melbourne, Australia

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step

    There's lots of discussion on C-41 on .
    Some people swear by premixed chemicals, some (like myself) roll their own completely. One contributor (a retired Kodak chemical engineer) emphasises that one cannot formulate an effective long-lived blix and strongly espouses the use of separate bleach and fixer.
    My own preferred protocol uses a water pre-soak, developer, stop bath (water rinse) bleach (water rinse) fixer (water wash) and stabiliser. The only solution requiring tight temperature control is the developer. The use of a stop bath extends the life of the bleach which is by far the most expensive solution.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Flint, MI

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step

    Freestyle carries a three different three step C41 kits.

  6. #6

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step

    Thanks Darryl!

    i wonder who makes Arista for them?

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Rochester NY

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step


    To achieve the degree of color purity and tone scale that C-41 films currently have, they use DIR couplers and high iodide crystals. This and the thick structure makes them nearly impossible to blix. They need a bleach step then fix step. The bleach and fix are more concentrated this way than a single solution would be.

    A powder blix will probably not work well at all, and a liquid blix may work to a certain extent but will leave a lot of silver behind in the coating in saturated colors or high density areas, which will dull the colors and increase the apparent grain (silver + dye specks).

    We did design, at EK, a blix for film that worked. It was never put into production even though it was patented. All other blixes on the market the last I heard (in the late 90s) failed to remove a substantial portion of the silver from the film. At that time, there were several 'super blix' formuas at EK, but all were rather expensive to produce using organic accelerants.

    I am still working on this problem to date. It is not an easy one to solve. I have a potential solution to this problem in-hand, but I cannot recommend any of the so-called blixes on the market.


    Ron Mowrey

  8. #8

    Re: C-41 chemicals 3-step

    Thanks for your input Ron.

Similar Threads

  1. E6 Processing Chemicals
    By goose in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 7-Nov-2006, 16:33
  2. 3 step E6 vs 6 step E6
    By Craig Griffiths in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 14-Jul-2006, 12:19
  3. Can you re-use photo chemicals and other ??'s
    By Ellen Stoune Duralia in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2-Feb-2005, 01:49
  4. calibrated negative step tablet
    By Anausagi in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 8-Jul-2000, 13:06


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts