for all the artyfarty-phobes out there...:
http://photo-muse.blogspot.com/2007/...ginity-on.html
for all the artyfarty-phobes out there...:
http://photo-muse.blogspot.com/2007/...ginity-on.html
You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn
www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog
This is why I've always been drawn to Duane Michals' art. There's no BS.
Ah come on, you mean the beard I want to grow and piano lessons I want to take plus the floppy hat won't make me a great landscape photographer!
*************************
Eric Rose
www.ericrose.com
I don't play the piano, I don't have a beard and I listen to AC/DC in the darkroom. I have no hope as a photographer.
Personally, I love Duane Michaels...both his work and his personality. He spoke at a college I attended a couple of decades ago and I decided two things. He was a great person and a poor influence. His work is sufficiently unique that to produce something similar could only make you look like you were trying to follow in his footsteps. The technical quality of his prints (those he had with him, anyway) was superb, but it was the image content that grabbed your eye. These two factors made for a marvelous display.
But that's the beauty of analyzing other photographers work. I hate Cindy Sherman (as apparently so does he) and some of you hate Duane Michaels. Is there ANYONE out there that we ALL love?
Hasn't photography always been a commercial medium?
I thought this was the reason so many clickers are insecure about it being an art form.
Art in photography seems to be the exception rather than the rule.
Bookmarks