Or is this gentlemen Michael Reichman who owns Luminous landscape, one of the less accomplished professional photographers? He may really know his digital cameras and techie stuff but can't seem to pull out a decent photo from all those expensive high-tech silicon chips.
Even the photo that was intended to be provocative with the name of "lolita" is anything but sexual. It is, in fact, a dreadful photo that is not alluring. For another example look at the home page landscape photo for today (5/18/07) and you will see what Im talking about.
It must be easier to get a name when you have all kinds of money to buy the newest digital backs etc.
About every photo I have ever seen posted on the LF forum is FAR superior both technically and in content to anything that I have seen of his.
I'm not just slamming him, I have never spoken or exchanged a single word with Mr. Reichman and Im sure he is a nice enough fellow. I just dont understand how he has become such a name on the web without any obvious photographic skills?
George
Bookmarks