Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    I have tried this as a shortcut to shooting film. Will it lead me astray ?

    • Find a smooth white wall on a sunny day. Get a lens, remove the caps, open the diaphragm, and point it to a subject that contains a reflection of the sun. When in focus, the sun should be a very small white spot.
    • Move the lens further away from the wall, and closer to the sun. The image on the wall will get larger, and the spot will now be a circular disk. If the disk looks like a ring, or has a ringed edge, you have bad bokeh. If the disk is not circular, you've got coma. If the disk is uniform, then you have nice bokeh. If the disk has very soft edges, you have very nice bokeh.
    • Repeat the process by moving the lens closer to the wall than ideal focus. Now you have tested both regions of focus.
    • Try the same thing with the lens stopped down. See how much the diaphragm blades affect the shape of the disk. If the disk is now shaped like a polygon, you've got bad bokeh. If the disk is still fairly uniform, you've got nice bokeh.


    This gives rise to another question: Given that a diaphragm with many blades is desirable for this sort of thing: is there a way to replace the diaphragm of a modern lens, mounted in a stock shutter - while retaining the modern shutter ?

  2. #2
    Jack Flesher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    1,071

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    I am sure many will disagree with me, but I personally do not think Bokeh and rendering of spectral highlights -- whther in focus or out -- necessarily always correlate...
    Jack Flesher

    www.getdpi.com

  3. #3

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    I think one issue is shooting into the sun. It can be a generally bad idea, unless you really have on other way to get the image you want. Even legendary lens can show up harsh or bad looking defocus area distractions when pointed at a light source.

    I think an easier test would be to set up objects with sharp edges at various distances relative to each other. Then photograph the various objects, and decide how you like the defocus rendition. You can then expand further by photographing the same objects at differing camera to subject distances.

    My own way of doing this, in any format, is simply to use the lenses in ways I would normally shoot. Quite often that can be up close to mid distance, rarely infinity focus, and often near wide open aperture. I rarely ever shoot with point souce lighting in the background areas, nor towards the sun. Of course, other people might have different patterns of use than I do, so I might not be a good person to ask about lens recommendations.

    Ciao!

    Gordon Moat
    A G Studio

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    Sorry if I was unclear. I'm not looking for a good lens to shoot images of the Sun.

    I use the Sun, merely because it is small, bright, round (if you believe in that sort of thing) and readily available. :-)

    I am trying to do all of this without having to shoot/develop/print/inspect an image. Even better, forget the camera altogether.

  5. #5

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    Hello! You could always do a star test. Put the camera on a tripod and point it at a pole from 15 to 45 seconds depending on the focal length of the lens. The star images should be pinpoint thorughout the image for a perfect lens. Usually, there will be lens defects that become apparent at the corners. Stop down and repeat the test till all images are pinpoint. This is the optimum f-stop for the lens. You can repeat with the lens focused inside of infinity for our bokeh test as well, and compare the shots to your infinity focus test. Best regards.

    Mike

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Heald View Post
    Hello! You could always do a star test. Put the camera on a tripod and point it at a pole from 15 to 45 seconds depending on the focal length of the lens.
    Sorry, I don't understand: To what kind of pole are you referring - and how does that relate to stars, or star-shaped items ? Are you talking about the North or South pole-stars ? By 15 to 45 seconds, are you referring to a measurement of arc ?

    Thanks

  7. #7
    Ted Harris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,465

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    Ken, wouldn't be easier to just shoot some Polaroid? Whe I was writing the article on variable focus lenses a year+ ago that is what I did. I must have burned some 80 sheets of T55 and T72 while looking at the results, including the bokeh of course of 5 different lenses. Worked fine for me.

    On the shutter blades thing, look for modern Compur shutters too .... they have a lot more blades and a much rounder opening ... but don't look too hard I need more .

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    763

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    Just on shutter/apertures and bokeh, I have a 1900 something studio shutter that has a very "un" round opening yet the rendering of the oof areas is wonderful. In fact I would not be dissappointed if all my modern lenses rendered the backgrounds in the same way. Of course the actual glass plays a very large part in the final result.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sweet, ID
    Posts
    523

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    Ken-
    Not a bad plan, and would give you some insight into a given lens performance. My (limited) experience with using LF lenses wide open is that the distance to the object plane of focus makes a difference in how things look. Most (if not all) of my lenses (some moderen Japanese, some modern German, a few older Japanese, and a couple of very old ??? e.g. who made Conley agnastigmats) have good to great bokeh in the near distances from the object plane of focus, and a few have good to great bokeh in the distances just beyond the OPOF. Then there's a distance where things look not so good (especially if they are highlighted), and then things finally go very soft to non-distinguishable beyond that distance. So, as with most things of a technical nature, there are a lot of variables to try and get control of. I'm always very impressed with the images posted where these variables are under control (maybe intentional, maybe not). Good luck, don't let it keep you up at nights (unless you're into nighttime photography!). Paul.

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,640

    Re: Shortcut for testing bokeh ?

    I think the glass is as important as the iris shape, if not more so. But we've had that discussion here before, with inconclusive result from a debating perspective because of insufficient objective evidence. I do have plans for a controlled comparison test of different modern plasmats in identical shutters/irises that should demonstrate how much of a difference the glass alone makes, but given other commitments it may be a little while yet before I can get around to doing it.

    While looking at the rendering of point sources can help in understanding the optical principles at work, for selecting lenses to achieve esthetic goals there's no substitute for making real pictures. Subjects should be stuff you'd normally photograph where bokeh would be an issue for you. For me, the acid test is how a lens performs at middling aperture settings and focused at midrange, on a scene filled with trees that slowly fuzz out into the distance. The best lenses (for my taste and my purposes) turn the trees slowly into a silky, feathery blur that retains coherent form well into the OOF area; the worst render the OOF trees as a jangly double-line hash or as lumpy oatmeal.

    For other people, the more important criterion may be how isolated, distant OOF backgrounds are rendered, be it in portrait or landscape work. Or how relatively close backgrounds are rendered in studio portraits. Or how OOF areas behave in close-up still life work. Or whatever.

    Lenses that do well at one of these tasks won't necessarily be best for others. Also, I don't know of any lens, even among my favorites, that doesn't have some situations in which the image character has unpleasant elements; and conversely, even many lenses that I don't much care for overall, have situations in which they do just fine. So don't get carried away in pursuit of a mythical lens with perfect bokeh. Figure out what aspects of OOF character matter to you for the kind of pictures you like to take, and make your own judgments of fitness for purpose from test pictures taken in those situations.

Similar Threads

  1. Bokeh again: aperture blades round or edgy?
    By ramin in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 21-Sep-2005, 15:40
  2. "More" bokeh?
    By Mark Sawyer in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-Sep-2005, 13:32
  3. bokeh
    By terry_5379 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 6-Jun-2005, 15:35
  4. Bokeh, and Tessar type lenses
    By Hening Bettermann in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 7-May-2005, 01:57
  5. Let's Cut the Bokeh...
    By Scott Rosenberg in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 3-Mar-2005, 09:41

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •