Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Horseman 45HD v. Toyo AX/AII

  1. #1

    Horseman 45HD v. Toyo AX/AII

    I am looking to buy a 4x5 field for backpacking (the Sinar 4x5 has been sitting at the back of my closet for almost 3 years...) and having read through many thr eads, was wondering if anyone could clue me in as to the potential advantages/dr awbacks of the Horseman 45HD?

    As I read the specs and opinions, it seems the Horseman saves about two pounds o f weight over the Toyo and at the expense of less bellows extension and some mov ements of the back.

    Thanks for your input!


  2. #2

    Horseman 45HD v. Toyo AX/AII

    Although I haven't used either the Horseman HD or FA (I use a Horseman VH 6 cm x 9cm camera), I would select the Horseman FA over the HD. The FA allows for back movements, unlike the HD. In that respect, the FA is almost identical to the Horseman VH, but, of course, it is for a larger format.

  3. #3

    Horseman 45HD v. Toyo AX/AII

    I've never used a Horseman, but I do use a Toyo AX and have no complaints. It is quite solid and reliable. The additional weight is of no concern to me.

  4. #4

    Horseman 45HD v. Toyo AX/AII


    I made a similar decision a couple of years ago. My assumptions were as follow:

    1) My definition of backpacking includes multi-day hikes which includes bringing food, clothing and tent. This is the realm of the $18 titanium cup to save 3oz ($18.00/3.1 oz for Titanium Cup - source

    2) In general, I will be shooting landscapes. At times, I may shoot some macros w/ a 90mm.

    3) I wanted a metal field camera, not a wood one. This is for stability and durability.

    In my case, I was choosing between the Horseman HD (3.7lb - vs K.B. Canham DLC (4.8lbs - Delta is 17.6oz.

    Both were similar in cost (~$2k). I did not consider either the Toyo AX (5.8lbs) nor the AII (6.2lbs) because I believe that for my purposes, no feature existed on the Toyo warranted the extra weight. If I was willing to carry >4.5lbs, I would have purchased a Canham DLC. I did rent one before I purchased my Horsemand. If the Canham were closer in weight (<8oz) I would have bought the Canham.

    Now here is a question. Is some extra underwear worth the tilts and shifts and most importantly the bellows extension that the DLC offers? For me, no. I've shot a couple of trips and notice several things:

    1) I use very modest tilts and shifts.

    2) I did not miss back movements at all.

    My conclusions: For true backpacking - where you count every oz - I would give up back movements and bellows extension and go with the Horseman HD. For >3 day hikes, I would give up a metal camera and take a wood one or take a Mamiya 7.


  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2000

    Horseman 45HD v. Toyo AX/AII


    I faced the same choice two month ago. I tried both Horseman HD and Toyo AX II. The build quality, look and feel of the two are quite close. I choose the HD because the weight saving and because for backpacking, I only use 75mm and 180mm. I don't miss the back movement at all. ALso HD is smaller in size. I can easily fit everything(spot meter, filters, filmback, etc) into a Nature Trekker.


Similar Threads

  1. Sic transit Horseman VH, 45HD, LE
    By Oren Grad in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2-Mar-2006, 08:11
  2. first LF camera--toyo 45a vs. horseman 45fa
    By Cindy_4701 in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 25-Oct-2004, 17:39
  3. Horseman Reflex Viewer on Toyo
    By Steven S. Miric in forum Gear
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-Nov-2001, 07:21
  4. 6X12 roll film on Toyo AII or Horseman FA/fHD
    By Larry Gaskill in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 7-Dec-2000, 13:51
  5. Toyo 45 AII vs. Horseman 45HD
    By NHP in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 7-Jul-2000, 16:39


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts