As many of you know, I waste too much time here and on eBay when I should be working. I didn't get into large format photography until 1983, but as I look at vintage lenses from the 60s and 70s I am struck by how closely the Copal shutters mimic the Compurs. Now I am also guilty of reading too deeply into the SK Grimes and LensN2Shutter websites, so I am already biased towards the Compur/Prontor shutters over the "cheap, lower quality" Copals. But I'd like to know a little of the history from the old(er) dogs who watched it happen. Except for the plastic levers, the shutters look almost identical from the late 1960s to recently. I am assuming it was the Japanese upstart Copal copying the premium German Compur cosmetics.
How come Compur didn't sue Copal for trademark infringement?
How come Compur didn't fight back a little bit harder? Even the German lens manufacturers seem to have gone to Copals... were they that much less expensive? And didn't people care about the quality and the ethics of the shutters they bought? Were the Copals somehow thought of as being better for some reason?
Or is it just the same Leica versus Nikon/Canon story replayed?
If I were Herr Compur I would have gone over to Japan and slapped that Mr. Copal right across the chops!
Bookmarks