Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: OPinions on the Nikkor M 450/9 lens?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Posts
    154

    OPinions on the Nikkor M 450/9 lens?

    I am thinking of purchasing the Nikkor 450/9 lens for 8x10 and i was wondering i f anyone had any comments about this lens? I am considering this lens mainly be cause of its price(new) and also because of its relatively small size, but does the slow speed hinder focusing? In addition, how does this lense perform at aro und f/16 - f/22?

    Thank you for any comments. Dave.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 1998
    Posts
    1,972

    OPinions on the Nikkor M 450/9 lens?

    i use the 300mm f/9 M-Nikkorfor bothof my 4x5 cameras and on a 6x17 cm camera an d while the image is darker than an f/5.6 lens i haven't had focusing problems. The 300mm is really terrific at f/22 down to /32.5. f/16 might be a li ttle too wide open both in terms of resolution and shallowness of your depth of focus.

  3. #3

    OPinions on the Nikkor M 450/9 lens?

    I have a Fujinon 450C f 12.5 that I use for 8x10. It is a small lens, #1 shutter, and costs $950 new from Mid West Camera Exchange. If size is important for you, I would opt for the Fujinon over the #3 shutter Nikon. I can focus okay with the small aperture, and I use a plain ground glass.

  4. #4

    OPinions on the Nikkor M 450/9 lens?

    I would agree with the previous respondent. Both the Fuji and the Nikon are marvelous lenses. You would not go wrong with either. I opted for the Fuji 450 12.5 because of the size. Every ounce of weight that you can do without I am all for. In addition to the Copal #1 shutter, it also takes a 52mm screw in filter, which is great to be able to go with a B+W. I have no problems with the 12.5 f stop.

  5. #5

    OPinions on the Nikkor M 450/9 lens?

    Dave,

    I completely agree with the previous posters. I owned the Nikkor 450 and switch ed to the Fuji 450.

    While both are excellent lenses for 8x10, the Fuji is much smaller and lighter than the Nikkor (copal 1 vs. copal 3 shutter, 52mm vs. 67mm front filter size), is equally sharp, has huge coverage for 8x10, and is about the same price.

    Both lenses are bright enough to focus and compose comfortably at their maximum apertures. This is really not a problem with this focal length.

    I've used both at f/22 to f/32 with success; I cannot remember when I've used it at f/16, other than when initially testing the lens.

    Good luck, Sergio.

Similar Threads

  1. Nikkor 360mm T-ED user opinions
    By Harley Goldman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14-Dec-2004, 21:19
  2. Need opinions on Caltar 210 f:5.6 lens on 4x5
    By Douglas P. Theall in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 23-Mar-2002, 16:00
  3. Opinions on Nikkor W 210mm f/5.6 vs. Rodenstock APO Sironar S 210mm f/5.6
    By Jamal Morris in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9-Dec-1999, 16:54
  4. Osaka Lens Opinions
    By Ian Dodd in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-Nov-1998, 23:59
  5. opinions concerning the 'best' normal lens for a 6x9
    By Raymond L. Fenio in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-Nov-1998, 22:27

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •