Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Bell extension factor vs. effective aperture

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    340

    Re: Bell extension factor vs. effective aperture

    Quote Originally Posted by lipi View Post
    Thanks!

    In my case the aperture diameter can be determined.
    Attachment 238885
    that's cheating! :P

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    13

    Re: Bell extension factor vs. effective aperture

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Bedo View Post
    As you extend the bellows, the aperture stays the same. The aperture is related to the focal length and the dimeter of the lens. These do not change.

    What changes is the amount of light that falls on the area of the format. As the lens moves away from the focal plane, the image circle expands, which spreads the available light out. The intensity of the light falling on the area of the format (the film) drops off inversely with the square of the distance.

    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law for an explanation of the inverse square law.

    Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number for an discussion of f-stops.
    You're absolutely right! That is why I use the "effective aperture" phrase...

Similar Threads

  1. Bellows Extension Factor & Flash Photography
    By jurgenestanislao in forum Lighting Techniques - Studio, Artificial
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 21-Nov-2020, 16:05
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 23-Apr-2020, 14:30
  3. Lazy bellows extension factor...
    By Mark Sawyer in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 9-Apr-2012, 18:46
  4. Effective aperture with 55 f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor on copal 0
    By noogie in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Jul-2010, 03:01
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24-Aug-2004, 15:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •