Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Hello from Kentucky

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Purcellville, VA
    Posts
    1,791

    Re: Hello from Kentucky

    The advantage of LF is that we can process a single sheet at a time. You might consider a simple test. Two way to do this are as follows.

    Use any suitable target, a plane surface with good contrast in fine detail; sometimes a printed sheet, e.g., flattened newspaper taped to a door or wall, is useful. You can also draw sharp, dark, thin X's on printer paper, cut out, and tape to the surface in an X pattern that will occupy 2/3 to 3/4 of the image. Set up the camera with all movements in the zero position (no swings or tilts) and determine that the camera back is vertical (assuming that your target is) and the camera horizontally parallel with the target as well. Make sure all tripods movements are locked in place. Focus carefully, lock down, close the shutter. Set the aperture wide open or perhaps just a half-stop closed (for slightly better optical performance) to minimize depth of field/depth of focus.

    If you have a couple of small trays, you can use some print developer, even at 2x the normal dilution, and just develop the film for 2-3 minutes, in total darkness of course, agitating the film gently. If you do this, under-expose your target by about 1 1/2 stops; print developer is active stuff, and we're not looking for beautiful tones, just sharp detail. Rinse the developed neg and then fix for a few minutes and wash in running water for a few more. Squeegee off the water well or pat the neg in paper towels (again, this is just a test) and hang to dry. Examine under a sharp loupe or other magnifier -- you may be able to use your camera lens, pointed backwards at the neg.

    The second approach is superior in one way, because, even if you selected plane of focus is not accurate, one will be, and you'll be able to see how sharp you lens is at the selected aperture. In this test, you use a flat plane angled to the camera. You can make one out of stiff cardboard formed into a V, book-like, to stand on a table, with the "front cover" angled at perhaps 35-45 degrees. Something larger than a book makes it easier, maybe 16x 20 inches or so. This time, draw a "ruler" on your target with, say, 7 vertical lines about a 1/4-inch apart, which, at 45 degree, will measure only about 1/8 difference in distance. Mark the middle one clearly with an X. Set your camera with the lens about middle the height of the target, squared up as before, except for the angled target plane. Focus on the X line, and proceed as above. The result wii show whether the X line or one closer or further is the sharpest.

    This should give you an idea.
    Philip Ulanowsky

    Sine scientia ars nihil est. (Without science/knowledge, art is nothing.)
    www.imagesinsilver.art
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/156933346@N07/

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    13

    Re: Hello from Kentucky

    Quote Originally Posted by Ulophot View Post
    The second approach is superior in one way, because, even if you selected plane of focus is not accurate, one will be, and you'll be able to see how sharp you lens is at the selected aperture. In this test, you use a flat plane angled to the camera. You can make one out of stiff cardboard formed into a V, book-like, to stand on a table, with the "front cover" angled at perhaps 35-45 degrees. Something larger than a book makes it easier, maybe 16x 20 inches or so. This time, draw a "ruler" on your target with, say, 7 vertical lines about a 1/4-inch apart, which, at 45 degree, will measure only about 1/8 difference in distance. Mark the middle one clearly with an X. Set your camera with the lens about middle the height of the target, squared up as before, except for the angled target plane. Focus on the X line, and proceed as above. The result wii show whether the X line or one closer or further is the sharpest.
    This is a cool idea. Thanks!

  3. #13
    kmp.13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    12

    Re: Hello from Kentucky

    Welcome!
    "One of my favorite things about the black and white darkroom is you can come in with a bunch of negatives and leave with a bunch of positives." - Mat Marrash, "The Joy of Printing."

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Van Alstyne, Tx.
    Posts
    172

    Re: Hello from Kentucky

    I am a former Calvert City and Paducah resident. So welcome to the addiction!

Similar Threads

  1. Hello from Kentucky!
    By jesselucas in forum Introductions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4-Aug-2018, 12:50
  2. Hello from Kentucky
    By ben_hutcherson in forum Introductions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 28-Feb-2017, 08:20
  3. E6 in Kentucky
    By Tintype Bob in forum Resources
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 9-Apr-2011, 05:00
  4. Greetings from Kentucky
    By JohnRichard in forum Introductions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-Oct-2009, 06:42
  5. Greetings from Kentucky
    By Ron Lee in forum Introductions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-Jul-2009, 18:14

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •