Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45

Thread: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

  1. #31
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,269

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Quote Originally Posted by jnantz View Post
    no infinite shelf life, bummer.
    Sealed powdered sodium thiosulfate fixer has at least a decades-long shelf life. I was using canned Korean War era military surplus powdered fixer up until I ran out last year.

    Just wondering, can the precipitated sulfur in rapid fix be redissolved somehow, perhaps by heating the solution?
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,022

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Sequestered unmixed powders are a different story. They can have long shelf lives. Generally only non-rapid (sodium thiosulfate) fixers are supplied this way but rapid fixers are the better processing option.

    Once the fix has sulfurized it is done. It’s decomposition of thiosulfate, not a matter of re-dissolving things that have come out of solution.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Sawyer View Post
    Sealed powdered sodium thiosulfate fixer has at least a decades-long shelf life. I was using canned Korean War era military surplus powdered fixer up until I ran out last year.

    Just wondering, can the precipitated sulfur in rapid fix be redissolved somehow, perhaps by heating the solution?

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,022

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R View Post
    For those interested in or wanting even faster fixing there is also PE’s Superfix I but it contains ammonium thiocyanate and thiourea to complement the ammonium thiosulfate.
    With the warning (that Ron made when disclosing these additives) that they may blister less well hardened emulsions. I'm not sure how much difference there really is between TF-5 and something like Tetenal's Superfix Odourless - or most C-41 fixes - I get the general impression that Ron/ PE's contributions to TF-5 were to that end.

    C-41 fix is highly efficient at removing residual dye etc - just in case anyone gets concerned about fix that's purple or luminous pink after use on B&W film...

  4. #34
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Quote Originally Posted by interneg View Post
    With the warning (that Ron made when disclosing these additives) that they may blister less well hardened emulsions. I'm not sure how much difference there really is between TF-5 and something like Tetenal's Superfix Odourless - or most C-41 fixes - I get the general impression that Ron/ PE's contributions to TF-5 were to that end.

    C-41 fix is highly efficient at removing residual dye etc - just in case anyone gets concerned about fix that's purple or luminous pink after use on B&W film...
    So would the use of C-41 fixer be avoided if one uses staining developers such as procat-hd, 510 pyro, ABC, etc?

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,084

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Stone View Post
    So would the use of C-41 fixer be avoided if one uses staining developers such as procat-hd, 510 pyro, ABC, etc?
    No, pyro stain is not cleared by c41 fixer.

  6. #36

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,022

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Stone View Post
    So would the use of C-41 fixer be avoided if one uses staining developers such as procat-hd, 510 pyro, ABC, etc?
    No. This is about excess/ waste sensitising/ trimmer/ antihalation dyes, not whatever imagewise coupler/ 'stain' of questionable archival stability that has been formed via the oxidation of Pyrogallol or one of the Dihydroxybenzenes.

  7. #37

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    2,454

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Perhaps I missed it, but I'm really surprised that no one has suggested that the fixer in question be tested. It may be "old", but it's very easy to simply test it.

  8. #38

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Greenbank, WA
    Posts
    2,614

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    If you pour the fixer out of the stock sealed bottle, it comes out as a yellowish clouded mush. It will choke a filter funnel in seconds. I don't think there is any question it is bad.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails fixer1.jpeg.jpg  

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Greenbank, WA
    Posts
    2,614

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    My working solution, which lasted longer than these two newer ones in reserve, didn't go toes up in the usual fashion. In the past, when the RF goes it gets lots of small while flakes in it. The working solution this time developed dark gray or black flakes. I got about 10 months out of it, no problem with that. But when a diluted solution outlasts the stock in the bottle, something is wrong at the factory.

    Kodak did request information on the mfg lot, which I gave them.

    Since I had some film to develop, I used a bottle of F6 I had mixed it up. It cleared the film quickly. It was a test with the Frankenfilm 200, which sure seems to me to be the same as Foma 200. Turned the developer bright green, just like Foma. Same half moon cut out in the corner, same style of packaging without an inner box.

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Greenbank, WA
    Posts
    2,614

    Re: Kodak chemicals -- now what??

    Of course I'll take it back if Freestyle tells me to pound sand, but so far the people making it now seem very responsive:

    Mr. Crisp,

    Thank you for sending photos which clearly provide the lot information needed to investigate this further. This information has been forwarded to the product team for further investigations to be completed.

    In the meantime, as we had previously suggested, please work directly with Freestyle on this issue to get your replacement product or credit.

    We apologize for the inconvenience this has caused you but are very happy that you have brought it to our attention to look into this further.

    Thank you!
    -Sino Promise Group Support

Similar Threads

  1. Unopened Kodak B/W Chemicals - How long do they last?
    By BKP in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2019, 07:59
  2. Kodak announces discontinuation of some chemicals
    By William McEwen in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 30-Nov-2009, 16:25
  3. HP5 in Kodak chemicals?
    By brian steinberger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-Sep-2005, 15:57

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •