"I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."
My opinion...it's all on the GG and don't much care if things change shape in the landscape.
"Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China
But do you consciously use back swing in the field to change shapes of objects or is it a side effect of trying to maximize DOD and/or align it as you want. Why would you not wish to go for wyswyg vs modifying shapes unless for effect? Just curious.
The exact shape of objects ('reality') is relatively unimportant in most cases in the natural landscape. I'll use back tilt to get leaning trees to line up nice and straight, or to get straight trees to lean inwards when it helps to move the viewers' eyes around my composition. Back swing could come in useful to create a different visual swoop down the length of a log. I always photograph for effect. I am not a documentarian.
WYSIWYG is exactly what I get -- that's what is great about the ground glass.
"Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China
Schneideritus is a bug not a feature.
Bookmarks