Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    191

    Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    I have a nice set of large Kodak gels of an indeterminate age. I have cut them down to use in my 4 x 5 enlarger and covering the bulb I use for contract printing 20x24. But they only go up to #4.

    I wanted to add #5 but could not find anything by Kodak used on line that was big enough.

    I did find a big new sheet of #5 Ilford and ordered it. It is rather pink compared to the dark amber #4 Kodak.

    Do Kodak and Ilford use the same grading systems for filters?

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,649

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    Quote Originally Posted by FrancisF View Post
    Do Kodak and Ilford use the same grading systems for filters?
    No.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,405

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    ...that said, you can certainly use an Ilford #5 filter to get more contrast than you're getting from the Kodak #4 filter.

    If you want to check if you're getting maximum contrast from your set of filters, make a print using your highest contrast filter and then on using a Wratten #47 blue filter. (You can do this using a step wedge to get quantifiable results - just count stripes - fewer = more contrast).

    I find that the #47 filter gets me significantly more contrast than the 170M setting on my Chromega heads.

    Best,

    Doremus

  4. #4

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    I tried to mix and match Kodak and Ilford, and quickly realized I was wasting materials and time. They have different effects on exposure time which are not easily translated back and forth. I ended up buying a full new Ilford set.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    2,444

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    Quote Originally Posted by Doremus Scudder View Post
    ...I find that the #47 filter gets me significantly more contrast than the 170M setting on my Chromega heads.
    Doremus
    Thanks for that info. I'll have to give it a try -- not that I have a #47, but it makes me wonder if I can increase contrast by having magenta in the enlarger head -- dichromatic 170M -- and a #5 under the lens.

    Should I try it? Probably a waste of time, right?

  6. #6
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,377

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    No magenta filter is going to be stronger than an actual 47 blue if it's not faded. Only 47B is stronger than that. But it's far more practical to use a real glass 47 filter below the lens.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,012

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    No. The contrast range is determined by the spectral sensitivity of a paper and the spectral content of the exposing light - which depends on the light source and filtration. It doesn’t make sense to ignore everything but the filter and/or assume a 47/47B will produce higher contrast than a magenta Ilford #5 filter. Look at an additive colour wheel. You ought to know this stuff with all your colour experience!

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    No magenta filter is going to be stronger than an actual 47 blue if it's not faded. Only 47B is stronger than that. But it's far more practical to use a real glass 47 filter below the lens.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    3,628

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    Kodak changed its "Polycontrast" filters in about 1989. The older set came in a bright yellow plastic box and went from grade 1 through 4. They are not very useful with modern variable-contrast papers. The newer version of the kit has filters from "-1" to "5+" and does work well with today's papers. The blue filter will give you the most contrast, but beware of focus shift.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,405

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Sampson View Post
    Kodak changed its "Polycontrast" filters in about 1989. The older set came in a bright yellow plastic box and went from grade 1 through 4. They are not very useful with modern variable-contrast papers. The newer version of the kit has filters from "-1" to "5+" and does work well with today's papers. The blue filter will give you the most contrast, but beware of focus shift.
    Focus shift is really only an issue with an enlarging lens that isn't well color-corrected. Most newer (relatively speaking) enlarger lenses won't have an issue. The problem arises when we focus using "white" light, which has a strong red component, and determine the focus with all that red in the mix. Then, if we expose with a high contrast filter, using mostly blue light, and the lens focuses blue in a significantly different plane than the red, sharpness can be affected.

    Still, this is a non-issue with a quality enlarging lens.

    Doremus

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,405

    Re: Ilford vs Kodak enlarger gels ???

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    Thanks for that info. I'll have to give it a try -- not that I have a #47, but it makes me wonder if I can increase contrast by having magenta in the enlarger head -- dichromatic 170M -- and a #5 under the lens.

    Should I try it? Probably a waste of time, right?
    If you have a step wedge, it's a pretty quick test. Just expose the wedge under both filtrations and count stripes. The exposure only has to be close enough to get the entire range of stripes from Dmin to Dmax.

    Doremus

Similar Threads

  1. Expired Kodak Photoflow, Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent, Ilford Rapid Fixer > still ok to
    By l2oBiN in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 28-Nov-2018, 16:04
  2. ilford 500H enlarger
    By greg zibell in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 3-Dec-2007, 05:35

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •