Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Fade to Black-WSJ article

  1. #1

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    Today's Walls Street Journal has an article about film and digital written by Douglas Gantenbein, a writer and photographer living in Port Townsend, WA.

    This link should allow the article to be viewed.

    http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110008086

    Regards,

    John Bailey

  2. #2

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    Please excuse the typo. Of course it should be 'today's Wall Street Journal'.

  3. #3

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    Will I make that leap? Not yet.

    Well, maybe.

    A digi P&S in my coat pocket. A Contessa in the other pocket.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Brookings OR
    Posts
    132

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    Dear Mr. Gantenbein,

    All told, you seem to have made quite a strong case for sticking with film--- in spite of yourself.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    625

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    "According to the Photo Marketing Association, digital cameras are likely to account for 90% of all
    cameras sold in 2006."

    This sounds like a ridiculously low underestimate to me, certainly for the U.S...

  6. #6
    MIke Sherck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Elkhart, IN
    Posts
    1,297

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    "We will not have a record of the individual stories that are told by families from one generation to another through pictures," Mr. Federman says. "That is a wealth of human history that will simply be lost."

    Noting that the article is discussing 35mm, I can't help thinking back to the beginning of the last century. I recall that our photographic records of the era are either large format or things such as tintypes. 35mm came along later. Now, barely a century later, we may be looking at a time when what future historians will have to remember us by is... large format photographs and alternative process images (tintypes -- Go Calamity Jane! -- calotypes, etc.) Actually, I find that rather amusing in a twisted sort of way. Sorry, I can't help that, I was always over-impressed with symmetry.
    Politically, aerodynamically, and fashionably incorrect.

  7. #7

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    Mike,

    I couldn't agree with you more about the symmetry.

    You might be interested in an earlier thread on this site started by Tim Atherton regarding the latest issue of Artnews, which deals with current photographic trends. You might also be amused by the author's omission of large format and alternative photographic processes.

    The thread is entitled: Contemporary Photographic Boom - digital or B&W?

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    That analysis is completely bogus. We don't save negatives or slides ( or CDs) for posterity. We save PRINTS. And they will be around from digital sources just as they were from film.
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

  9. #9
    Terence
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    391

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    I can't remember if I got this off of this site or Apug, so my apologies to uncredited sources, but it still cracks me up whenever people discuss about the longevity issues of digital photos :

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/45122

    Mind you, I'm one of apparently 10 folks (fact-checkers note: I counted all of the North America, Europe, Oceania and Asia) under the age of 40 who doesn't have a digital camera. And I recently found a hoard of metal (tintypes?) photos from "the old country" amongst my grandmother's former belongings. These are easily the oldest photos I've seen of my family. And indeed, they were in a shoe box.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    176

    Fade to Black-WSJ article

    As bad as the "digivangelists" who feel compelled to tell everyone within earshot how bad film was for them, are the wistful, wimpy columnists who combine innacurate information about the "death of film", with the theatrical gesture of throwing rose petals on its grave. The WSJ writer is of the latter type, and he is way below their usual standards.

Similar Threads

  1. New article: the 5x7 format
    By QT Luong in forum Feedback
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 7-Aug-2007, 09:14
  2. Replies: 49
    Last Post: 8-Jun-2006, 16:58
  3. Great article on Eggleston
    By Martin Patek-Strutsky in forum On Photography
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 11-Sep-2004, 22:16
  4. Will color head filters fade?
    By chris jordan in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-Jun-2001, 12:54
  5. Do Laminated Filters Fade?
    By William Marderness in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 6-Jun-2000, 15:11

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •