Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Too wide of a lens used...?

  1. #1
    Cor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    764

    Too wide of a lens used...?

    Hi,

    Due to circumstances I shot a subject (an open bridge) with a too wide of a lens, I used my f5.6 65mm SA while the scene could have been captured with my f8 90 mm SA. So when printing I did not use the whole negative but a part of the 4*5 negative. I was wondering if I would re shoot the scene with the 90 mm lens (from the same position), and print the whole negative, would the print be the same ?

    I think in theory it should, but in practice I wonder, the "distortion" and the spatial relation ship between the foreground, lamp posts, open bridge and trees in the background I feel are different between the 65 mm and 90 mm.

    Apart from re-shooting and testing myself; what would you think or experienced ?

    thanks,


    best,

    Cor

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    160

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    If you shoot from the exact same point, the perspective of a 65 and 90 are exactly the same, the 65 just covers more. When you have to crop that, quality will suffer, question is, if that's noticeable, so what's the degree of enlargement?
    I own the gear, but those don't make masterpieces. My everyday experience.

  3. #3
    Cor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    764

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    Quote Originally Posted by fotopfw View Post
    If you shoot from the exact same point, the perspective of a 65 and 90 are exactly the same, the 65 just covers more. When you have to crop that, quality will suffer, question is, if that's noticeable, so what's the degree of enlargement?
    yes, I realize that the loss of quality when not using the complete negative, and thus enlarging more is perhaps the biggest drawback; I usually print my 4*5 negatives on 30* 40 cm paper, sometimes (rarely) 50*60 cm. I do not think this enlargement noticeably suffers. The negative in question is Maco Ir film, and I used f32 to get everything sharp, this combination is not the sharpest anyway.

    Best,

    Cor

  4. #4
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,937

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    Perspective is only controlled by the camera (film) position, not lens. Some lenses may have inherently more or less pincushion or barrel distortion (lines not being straight) but likely that is not an issue for either of your lenses - and they are even the same design.
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  5. #5
    Cor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    764

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    Thanks !

    Got quite some distortion at the edges, ie leaning in traffic lights etc. But that was to be expected, since I had to point the camera up to record the open bridge parts which were vertical now. The 65mm f 5.6 has some coverage, but I use it on a flat board on a Linhof Color (still mange even than a 1-2 cm raise). Anyway these traffic lights were excluded from the print anyway, but than I got a bit in doubt, although I knew in theory it should not matter.

    best,
    Cor

  6. #6
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,937

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    If you a bit adventurous, you could correct some of the perspective distortion caused by tilting your camera/film up in the darkroom by tilting your baseboard or easel. DOF can also be controlled via tilting the lens on your enlarger, so that the tilted paper isn't half out of focus. Depends on how tilted you were! I've done this to correct very slight errors in my horizontal perspective or when I ran out of image circle.
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  7. #7
    Cor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    764

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    I have seen the trick in books, but I rather not mess with the alignment of my enlarger, even though it is Durst L1200 Laborator, and did not wanted the leaning distracting verticals in the final print anyway.

    Best,

    Cor

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Superior, WI
    Posts
    41

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    I think your best advantage would be to use the longer focal length lens and render the camera back more vertical than with your previous shorter focal length lens.

    Best wishes --- Allen Anway

  9. #9
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,385

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    Phrased less technically, especially wide lenses do lend more of a "stretched" look from the center outwards, like a rubber band pulling the scene by its corners. This is unrelated to either barrel or pincushion distortion per se, and simply comes with the territory of certain lenses, so to speak. I find that look quite annoying, regardless of the film format involved. There is also going to be more illumination falloff from center to edge with a shorter lens of equivalent design. If necessary, that can be corrected with a center-graduated neutral density filter. I've always thought of 65 and 75mm lenses on 4X5 as last resort options when photographing cramped interiors like kitchens and bathrooms. But some people are addicted to them. I'm personally addicted to the look which longer lenses provide, and try to back away somewhat if possible. That automatically provides a large image circle without risking a stretched or warped look.

  10. #10
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,758

    Re: Too wide of a lens used...?

    If you are unhappy with the resolution of your cropped image, you should re-shoot it so it fills the whole frame.
    The perspective of all lenses is the same. Perspective only changes when you move the lens with respect to the subject.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 7-May-2019, 10:50
  2. Lens caps for Kodak WIDE FIELD EKTAR 135mm f6.3 Lens
    By DolphinDan in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 17-Sep-2017, 21:59
  3. A wide-wide lens for a 12x20?
    By John Kasaian in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23-May-2009, 17:10

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •