Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: margins for alt process prints?

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,908

    Re: margins for alt process prints?

    What do you hae under the paper you are attempting to coat? That can make a big difference in their efficiency.

  2. #22
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,222

    Re: margins for alt process prints?

    If the paper's sizing resists the solution, rod-coating can be more difficult. Part of my routine is to whiggle the rod a little after squirting the solution along its length...so my first pass has solution all along its length. A touch of tween20 can make it much easier in those situations where the first pass has spotty coverage.

    Some papers such as Arches can benefit from a first few passes with distilled water to prep the paper.

    I have done about four passes with the rod (defines the area nicely), then finish with a damp (not wet) brush -- that works, too. But with Tween20, I have found the brushing is not needed.

    When working with platinum and palladium, one can easily refine the number of drops needed to cover with a rod (no unknown amount in the brush) without having a line of solution at the edge to clean up. This amount will change with paper, humidity and the phase of the moon.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,332

    Re: margins for alt process prints?

    Quote Originally Posted by martiansea View Post
    I tried a glass rod for the first time a couple days ago. The results were not good. I don't know if it was either because I need much more practice or need to use much more emulsion.
    My experiences is to have students practice coating paper using strong (room temperature) black coffee with both a rod and a brush. Most prefer one over the other, with the rod by far more preferred. First 6 times coating a penciled in rectangle on the paper, then switching to eight 1/2" marks outside of the area to be coated. 9 out of 10 students rush coating the paper rather than using slow controlled movements. Personally I like the visual edge effect of a brush over a rod, but use a rod because I seem to have more control and am able to move more slowly. I will demonstrate how to coat paper only once with a rod and once with a brush. From then on the students have to develop their own technique rather than try to duplicate mine. Biggest hurdle is that a lot of students try to hold down the paper with one hand instead of taping down the four corners.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts
    200

    Re: margins for alt process prints?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Noel View Post
    What do you hae under the paper you are attempting to coat? That can make a big difference in their efficiency.
    I had the paper taped directly to glass. I avoid anything under the paper that might have a texture, as I found this causes unevenness with brush coating.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts
    200

    Re: margins for alt process prints?

    I was finding that I could only do one pass. And if that one pass didn't cover evenly across, it was failed. Every time I tried to turn it around and do a second pass, the second pass would be extremely uneven and even start to get sticky and not go smoothly and completely messed up anything good from the first pass. This was with cyanotype with a couple different kinds of paper. I've never had an experience like this with a brush.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts
    200

    Re: margins for alt process prints?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
    If the paper's sizing resists the solution, rod-coating can be more difficult. Part of my routine is to whiggle the rod a little after squirting the solution along its length...so my first pass has solution all along its length. A touch of tween20 can make it much easier in those situations where the first pass has spotty coverage.

    Some papers such as Arches can benefit from a first few passes with distilled water to prep the paper.

    I have done about four passes with the rod (defines the area nicely), then finish with a damp (not wet) brush -- that works, too. But with Tween20, I have found the brushing is not needed.

    When working with platinum and palladium, one can easily refine the number of drops needed to cover with a rod (no unknown amount in the brush) without having a line of solution at the edge to clean up. This amount will change with paper, humidity and the phase of the moon.
    I will try dampening the paper and using some Tween 20. Thanks. I hope I can get this figured out. I thought glass rod would be the way to go for very even results, and I'm surprised by how counterintuitive it has been.

Similar Threads

  1. Alt-Process Prints from Digital Negatives or Positives
    By ndg in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 583
    Last Post: 3-Dec-2019, 20:10
  2. Use dry mount process for ink-jet and c-prints???
    By Brad Rippe in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 27-Sep-2012, 14:03
  3. Alternative Process Prints
    By Benno Jones in forum On Photography
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 20-Nov-2008, 14:30
  4. Proofing process - outsourced digital prints
    By Richard Fenner in forum Business
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8-Aug-2005, 06:17
  5. How to process FIBER PRINTS after the wash step?
    By Andre Noble in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27-Mar-2001, 14:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •