Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    53

    Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A

    Hello group,
    I have a Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A witch is upon the Voigtlander catalog a 10"5/6 : 275mm F/4.5
    I want to make some Waterhouse stop.
    When I mesure the full aperture at the Waterhouse stop place I get 55,5mm
    so I found that the full aperture of the lens is more F/4.95 than F/4.5 (275/55,5=4,95)
    does it sound right to you ?

    Laurent

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    381

    Re: Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A

    For a pinhole, it would be right. Once you get lenses involved, things change.

    If you place a SLR in back of your camera, you can find effective aperture pretty close when comparing with a modern lens you trust the aperture of.

    Sent fra min SM-G975F via Tapatalk

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    6,254

    Re: Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A

    Yes, it does Sound right!

    It is quite normal that the longer focal lengths do not quite met the formal speed give to a Series.
    For instance, the size 8A - focal length 25”, front lens diameter 5” - is even further away from F.4.5.

    Or even more dramatic, size 9 series IV has a focal length of 46” and a diameter of 6.5” and doesn’t come close to the “promised” F6!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    53

    Re: Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Tribe View Post
    Yes, it does Sound right!
    focal length 25”, front lens diameter 5”
    yes you may be right, but I understand than you don't have to mesure the front lens diameter but the "entrance pupil" that it is placed at the diaphragm

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    6,254

    Re: Portrait Euryscop Series III N°4A

    Quote Originally Posted by Laurent Laval View Post
    yes you may be right, but I understand than you don't have to mesure the front lens diameter but the "entrance pupil" that it is placed at the diaphragm
    ………..as seen from in front of the front lens!

Similar Threads

  1. 42CM Heliar Vss 42CM Euryscop Portrait Series III
    By Jim Galli in forum Image Sharing (LF) & Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 31-Mar-2011, 21:43

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •