Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    3,957

    8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    For those experienced in both 8x10 and 4x5 photography, how do the methods and the types of scenes or subject matter photographed differ between the two formats?

    I know there's been quite a bit of discussion on 4x5 vs. 8x10. But, I'm really interested.

    For example, I took a couple of John Sexton workshops in the last few years, and he said at one point that he's a 4x5 person. He has an 8x10 somewhere in his storage areas, but he wasn't sure where. He just doesn't use 8x10.

    Do people see differently in 4x5 versus 8x10? Might the different sizes between the two format affect the quality of the compositions?

    How tough is it to achieve depths of field that's readily available in 4x5?
    Last edited by neil poulsen; 24-Mar-2021 at 13:26.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    724

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    For someone who is truly good, it probably doesn't make all that much of a difference, unless there are specific technical aspects of a particular subject making one format more suitable. I can think of some great artists in both formats with wide varieties of subject matter.

    For people who are not as good and/or are not doing it full time (ie don't have the camera work down to second nature), in my experience the size of the format is generally inversely related to the quality of the work. I know not many will agree with me on that.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    3,957

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R View Post
    . . . in my experience the size of the format is generally inversely related to the quality of the work. I know not many will agree with me on that.
    That's interesting. General opinion would suggest that the larger the format, the better the photograph. But, I suspect that the differing methodologies for the two formats have their own impact on the quality of the image.

  4. #4
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,978

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    Only you can answer the question. After years of 4x5 photography, I know the answer when I printed my first 8x10 negative.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,140

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    I work with both 4x5 and 8x10 photographing similar scenes, regardless of format. That said, most will immediately recognize the increased effort required with the larger 8x10 format vs the smaller 4x5. It's heavier and bulkier, the longer lens focal lengths mean shallower DOF, smaller apertures mean longer shutter speeds, subject and camera movement in the wind can be challenging, etc. However, given all the restrictions and considerations 8x10 is actually my preferred format. I swear that something happens to my mind/brain when viewing my image on the groundglass at final print size! And, I absolutely LOVE contact prints.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    724

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    Quote Originally Posted by neil poulsen View Post
    That's really interesting. Common speculation would suggest that the larger the format, the better the image.
    I think that's kind of the hope people have, based on the notion that the bigger camera slows you down and forces you to be more attentive to composition etc. etc. I understand how that seems logical, but in my experience it is more myth than reality. It seems instead to be the opposite - that is, the bigger, more fiddly equipment tends to take over and actually inhibit the seeing.

    Again, this is my view and I don't think many people will agree. It's also a generalization, of course. There are exceptions.

  7. #7
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    16,802

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    I have bad eyes since birth nobody. noticed until was 7. Almost as soon as I got the miracle of eyeglasses, I started taking pictures to see even better.

    I shot Pentax 35 for decades and never heard of LF until age 50. Finally age 60 I found LF.

    I find the bigger the GG the better for me!

    I am now 70 and looking forward to Pictorialism on ever big GG.

    YMMV

    after that too passes I have my very active dreams
    Last edited by Tin Can; 24-Mar-2021 at 15:16.
    Images vastly preferred

    not game trying to


    focus


    In Time

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    452

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    Of course itís inversely proportional! The best photographic works ever were shot with Minox (8◊11 mm) and 110 film!!

    /s

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    SooooCal/LA USA
    Posts
    2,271

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    Depends on the camera and how well you interface with it... Comparing an ancient wood camera to a modern metal monorail is like comparing a Sopwith Camel with a fighter jet, but both have their charms...

    A bigger old wood camera usually is more difficult to get precise movements, and the large bellows pleats are stiffer, making subtle movements hard, and the longer FL tends to not be as responsive to greater movements...

    My modern take on shooting is whatever can get you on/off site faster is best (before you attract unwanted attention)... (I can get my Linhof Tek out of a car and shot in less than 10 minutes total, and if security shows up, I'm waving them goodbye by then...

    My other take is how big of a piece of film do you need??? 4X5 will enlarge in a common enlarger, but if you need a big piece of film for 1:1 contact printing or alt processes, you need bigger...

    Sometimes with bigger, you are just asking for trouble (unless you LIKE to flog yourself... ;-)

    But to each, their own...

    Steve K

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,618

    Re: 8x10 Photography Compared to 4x5 Photography?

    Quote Originally Posted by neil poulsen View Post
    For those experienced in both 8x10 and 4x5 photography, how do the methods and the types of scenes or subject matter photographed differ between the two formats?

    I know there's been quite a bit of discussion on 4x5 vs. 8x10. But, I'm really interested.

    For example, I took a couple of John Sexton workshops in the last few years, and he said at one point that he's a 4x5 person. He has an 8x10 somewhere in his storage areas, but he wasn't sure where. He just doesn't use 8x10.

    Do people see differently in 4x5 versus 8x10? Might the different sizes between the two format affect the quality of the compositions?

    How tough is it to achieve depths of field that's readily available in 4x5?
    Yes, I believe people see differently with 4x5 vs 8x10.Iknow when I moved to 810 it took several outings before I felt i was filling the image area as efficiently.
    For me it is no more difficult to achieve similar DOF. It just requires familiarity with the different lenses used, and stopping down more, while also making correct movements.

Similar Threads

  1. New Photography Project and Newbie to LF Photography
    By JChrome in forum Image Sharing (LF) & Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2-Jun-2015, 08:49
  2. Digital Photography Workflow: Fine Art Photography
    By michaelezra in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22-Jul-2008, 13:26
  3. 8x10 photography
    By Alan Spears in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 31-May-1998, 23:05

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •