Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: To buy or not to buy an Epson 850

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    397

    Re: To buy or not to buy

    Quote Originally Posted by lenicolas View Post
    I made a 4min video on how I invert my color negatives. It takes just three adjustment layers and no extra plugin. I get more consistent results than with silverfast because nothing is left to the interpretation of a software.
    Does your method work as easily and consistently on negatives of Green grass (and nothing else in it) or Red, Blue( you name it solid-color walls) with nothing close to Black and White in the image?
    What about images with distinct tint , such as twilight scenes?

    Thank you,
    SergeyT

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    397

    Re: To buy or not to buy an Epson 850

    I have never worked with Epsons, but according to the comparisons done by other forum members, they appear to be as good as it gets when it comes to finding a scanner that can be used to scan 4x5 and larger, is current and on a budget.
    Where they are lacking :
    - Fidelity of tone reproduction (a flaw that is typical to all flat bed scanners regardless of the price range). At the end of the day it might not be that important or detectable on a majority of scans, especially when it comes to scanning of color or BW negatives.
    - Absence of batch scanning. Each sheet will have to be mounted , scanned and unmounted individually.
    - No auto-focus
    Resolution is not an issue. Are you going to be making 100s of 40x50 prints from your scans? If yes, then how much that printing will cost in comparison to scanning cost?

    Are there better options? Certainly but they come with a bunch of their issues.

    High-end flat-bed scanners :
    - Allow for an easy batch scanning. Lay your 4x5s on a 12x18 scanner bed, do a prescan, set the scanning parameters for each prescan and let the scanner and computer do the magic, while spending your time on something meaningful or fun. That feature alone makes a digicam scanning a no-go for me. Also a post capture stitching that is required to increase the resolution when digitizing a 4x5 with a digicam is absolutely not my thing.
    - Allow for a wet mounting (and still batch scanning) . Smoothes out all the artifacts from minor scratches and grain. Enhances the contrast and tone reproduction fidelity.
    - Can outresole the Epsons and can be practically used for scanning any film formats from 35mm and on
    - They are bulky and heavy (for a good reason- built to last , work 24x7 and be exceptionally precise)
    - The software to run them requires and older hardware (mostly MACs with OS 12.8 and sometimes even OS 9)
    - Sometimes can be found next to nothing, but the supply is getting scarce
    - Usually come with no support from manufacturers. But if they were faulty they would not make it that far anyway...
    - There are dedicated forums or groups where plenty of knowledge and support can be gained
    - There are vendors that refurbish and sell then with limited after sale support. Will cost $$$

    Drum scanners :
    - Are the ultimate digitizing machines when it comes to scanning film.
    - The major advantage of a drum scanner over a flatbed (any flatbed) is that they do not suffer from flare and therefore (if calibrated and profiled properly) produce the most accurate representation of the film originals. Is this advantage always obvious? In my experience - it depends. On 4x5s and up it is hard to see usually. On 35mm it is obvious most of the time if you look at the scans side by side. Scans from flatbeds require a more aggressive sharpening to match the perceived crispness of images from drum scanners.
    - Unlike the common wisdom that many photo forums suggest , from a practical standpoint, scanning resolution is not the major advantage of drum scanners and in many cases can be easily matched by high end flatbed scanners
    - all other points for high-end scanners equally apply here

    SergeyT

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    202

    Re: To buy or not to buy

    Quote Originally Posted by SergeyT View Post
    Does your method work as easily and consistently on negatives of Green grass (and nothing else in it) or Red, Blue( you name it solid-color walls) with nothing close to Black and White in the image?
    What about images with distinct tint , such as twilight scenes?

    Thank you,
    SergeyT
    Hi, I assume you mean “does the method work when there’s no real black, grey or white point in the image?”
    I’m not a landscape guy, and I rarely photograph in very difficult light. ��
    My personal belief is that there is no “truth” when it comes to Colours out of a colour negative. It’s always meant to be interpreted. Back in school when I used to print color negs on RA4 paper with an enlarger, I quickly found out that even on the same roll, different images always needed different filtration. What I’m saying is that yes, I always manage to get colours I’m happy with, but I don’t know if they’d satisfy photographers more enclined to capture “true colours”. When I am after “true colour”, I’d rather use digital with a colour checker card.

    That being said, here are a couple files for you to play with if you’re curious to try my technique. These images are as hard as it gets to convert : lots of greens, and a blue hour shot.
    Both files are opened in CR to crop and I took a white balance reading off of the film border. No other adjustments made.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CEC804E3-5392-4103-9E0C-BF40F409728C.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	102.1 KB 
ID:	210196
    Mostly Grass, Portra 160, Mamiya C330s 105mm f/3.5

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7399CE73-289D-43F4-8ABD-19CFA233B44F.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	62.9 KB 
ID:	210197
    Blue hour, Portra 400, Mamiya C330s 105mm f/3.5


    And here are my own processing of these images, using the method from my video (I did use gradient adjustments in Camera Raw filter to vignette the car picture)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	101A1C05-88C4-49CD-A747-C8921BE7F247.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	233.9 KB 
ID:	210198

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A7CEC6DE-B915-465F-B08C-DF5A5212FBB0.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	72.4 KB 
ID:	210199

    Have a nice Sunday. ✌��
    Last edited by lenicolas; 6-Dec-2020 at 08:06. Reason: Typos
    "I am a reflection photographing other reflections within a reflection. To photograph reality is to photograph nothing." Duane Michals

  4. #14
    Alan Klein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    New Jersey was NYC
    Posts
    2,580

    Re: To buy or not to buy an Epson 850

    After ten years using a V600 with medium format, I bought a V850 this year when I started shooting 4x5 since the V600 does not handle 4x5. It does a nice job. Here are 4x5 samples.
    https://www.flickr.com/search/?sort=...N05&view_all=1

    I did a comparison between my V850 and another member's Howtek 8000. The V850 compares favorably although obviously it's not as good. The thread is here
    https://www.largeformatphotography.i...ghlight=howtek

    The V850 comes to two films holder for each size. That allows you to load the next film while the current is scanning. I don;t shoot 8x10. But the unit uses a less impressive lens for 8x10 then for 4x5 and smaller. The 8x10 sits on the glass while the other films use their special film holders. But since 8x10 is such a large format, other people have informed that the performance is still very good even though it's using the less resolving lens.

    I've used Epsonscan software for both my V600 and V850 scanners. I don't often shoot color negative. But some people say Silverfast is better with that kind of film. But I can't confirm that or not.

    Finally, scanning is a learning process. It can be frustrating and time consuming. If you get to the point where you want to blow your brains out, just know that we've been there too. Take a break. Have a schnapps or two. And come back here to ask a lot of questions once you get into it. Good luck.

Similar Threads

  1. Epson V700 - dumb question - betterscanning/epson holders
    By Meekyman in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16-Feb-2014, 13:47
  2. EPSON 4990 epson scan thumbnail preview problem?
    By Eugene Yang in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17-Feb-2006, 13:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •