Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 135 Omegaron vs 162 Kodak?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    9,599

    135 Omegaron vs 162 Kodak?

    Depending of condition of course, but assuming they are both in good condition, which one would you be willing to hang on the snout of an Omega D-II?
    I'm looking a box of parts I could use and there's Kodak enlarging lens on an Omega cone----could the Kodak be an improvement over my Omegaron?

    Consider that I can coax the worse out of any of the finest lenses made.
    "I would feel more optimistic about a bright future for man if he spent less time proving that he can outwit Nature and more time tasting her sweetness and respecting her seniority"---EB White

  2. #2

    Re: 135 Omegaron vs 162 Kodak?

    If the Kodak is the Ektanon definitely go with it. If it is the Anastigmat then test it against the Omegaron. You may find that you like using the longer lens. I had an Omegaron and thought it was pretty good until I got something else;-)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 24-Nov-2013, 10:46
  2. Are Rodenstock Omegaron lenses any good?
    By davidb in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Jun-2006, 17:16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •