It's been a while but I'm getting back in LF and I'm interested in buying a heliar. Can someone explain the difference between older and newer heliars to me? Should I avoid older heliars? Does it matter? I can't find a lot of information about them other than the fact that people like them and I also like the photos I've seen taken by them.
Thanks in advance!
Use google site search of this site. Lots of good info already shared.
thus... google: heliar site:https://www.largeformatphotography.info
If you find a dead link then check https://archive.org/
Changes are that it is archived.
See A Short History of the Heliar Lenses
I've never seen anyone do a rigorous Heliar-only study where they shoot an unchanging subject under unchanging conditions and simply change the lens - but having made photos with a few Heliar lenses, I would refer you to our own Christopher Perez's study of out-of-focus rendition of non-Heliar lenses, since the principles are the same.
See "Out of Focus Rendition Studies" at http://photosketchpad.blogspot.com/
Here are some questions to keep in mind when comparing:
Given that a lens renders in-focus areas with adequate sharpness, what happens in front of and behind the plane of sharp focus: are optical aberrations over-corrected or under-corrected ?
What do under-, over-, and properly corrected aberrations look like ? As we stop down the lens, do the aberrations go away ?
How far do we have to stop-down a given lens before aberrations are controlled ? Do all lenses behave the same once we reach a certain aperture, or are there some which never lose their aberrations no matter what we do ?
Do some lenses have controls which let us vary the aberrations, independent of aperture ?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks