I’ve been able to handle a few 11x14’s of friends and colleagues and have noticed that the sheer mass of ULF cameras make for some “wonky” rear standards.

I’m curious if a camera maker like Richard Ritter could strip the movements off an existing camera to make the rear more solid or if the nature of these cameras and their mass make for a perception of instability. Those who own those cameras all told me they fear soft negatives because of this perception of instability but in practice the cameras work. It’s an interesting note.

Could you work with a more limited tool?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk