Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Turner Reich Triple Conv. date..

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,332

    Re: Turner Reich Triple Conv. date..

    Quote Originally Posted by interneg View Post
    I could be wrong, but some quick research suggests Burke and James bought Gundlach in the early 50's, re-named them Dynamic Optics Inc., which became D.O.Industries in the early '70's. Given this history, it's entirely possible that B&J also may have re-manufactured/ re-coated/ assembled into new shutters extant Gundlach optical blocks.
    In the early 1970s, acquired my first 8x10 lens from Burk & James, a very early 12 inch f/4.5 Wollensak Velostigmat. Burke & James had (re?)coated the optics and mounted it in a Betax No 5 shutter along with one of their 8x10 Commercial view cameras. Back then I received a hand typed personal letter from B&J documenting the history of the lens!

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Posts
    285

    Re: Turner Reich Triple Conv. date..

    Amazing Greg! That kind of service is long gone. I wonder if Lynn Jones may have had something to do with that...

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: Turner Reich Triple Conv. date..

    I've got a 5x8 version (8.5", I guess), #214900, and it's uncoated, so the several mentioned before that with coating must have been among the first coated ones, or coated later.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Posts
    285

    Re: Turner Reich Triple Conv. date..

    Quote Originally Posted by mdarnton View Post
    I've got a 5x8 version (8.5", I guess), #214900, and it's uncoated, so the several mentioned before that with coating must have been among the first coated ones, or coated later.
    Interesting Michael. This lens seem to have been well maintained so perhaps someone had did have it coated somewhere along the way...and turned out to be much newer than I thought it would be. I guess I just lucked out for once...Thank you!

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: Turner Reich Triple Conv. date..

    Mine shows the tiniest bit of separation around the edges, completely insignificant, which is a common problem with these lenses. I don't find it hard to think that in the 50s and 60s it would have been economical to tear them down to be recemented, and coating them at that time because you could and you were there would have been completely logical.
    Thanks, but I'd rather just watch:
    Large format: http://flickr.com/michaeldarnton
    Mostly 35mm: http://flickr.com/mdarnton
    You want digital, color, etc?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradofear

Similar Threads

  1. Turner Reich Triple Convertible ? ? ? ?
    By Dan Dozer in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 24-Jul-2005, 14:57
  2. turner riesch triple conv
    By Ronald J LaMarsh in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 1-Jul-1999, 21:17

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •