Originally Posted by
interneg
The only question Pere, is whether you are going to rescan that negative tomorrow using the system you espouse and show that the granularity in the sky/ clouds can be adequately imaged compared to known examples of HP5+.
Your unwillingness to do so makes it more and more clear to everyone that you are unable to back up your claims with any repeatable evidence whatsoever.
If you simply stopped making hyperinflated claims about the Epson, a lot of the trouble you get yourself into would go away.
Bookmarks