Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 54 of 54

Thread: Resolution Comparison Between Films?

  1. #51

    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    25

    Re: Resolution Comparison Between Films?

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Wiley View Post
    RMS granularity is valid for comparing related films from the same manufacturer, but it can be a bit misleading if comparing chrome and color neg films, which are different categories. Of course, one can reasonably assume that a slower film like Porta 160 is going to be finer-grained than a fast film like Portra 400. And their advertised claim that Ektar is their finest grained CN film of all is true. But that doesn't mean Velvia 50 is going to have less visible grain because, as a chrome film, it handles that grain differently. But again, in large format work, this is all largely a non-issue, whereas contrast range and specific color palette probably will be an important factor. Forget "pixel peeping". Start printing true optical with fine gear and everything digitally printed starts looking gritty. And yes, people do stick their noses right up to my prints, even 30x40 inch ones. If the detail is there, people will want to take it in. The nonsensical law of "normal viewing distance" is meant to be broken.
    Glad I'm not crazy! I've always thought inkjet prints look pixelated, especially close up. Too bad I can't make color prints.

    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

  2. #52

    Re: Resolution Comparison Between Films?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheathins View Post
    Glad I'm not crazy! I've always thought inkjet prints look pixelated, especially close up. Too bad I can't make color prints. gbwhatsapp

    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    What printer you are using?
    Last edited by ghosttuner; 14-Jan-2023 at 04:20.

  3. #53
    multi format
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    local
    Posts
    4,854

    Re: Resolution Comparison Between Films?

    Quote Originally Posted by ghosttuner View Post
    What printer you are using?
    I know, I've made 30x X and larger pigment prints they look anything but pixelated, they look as if they were enlarged.
    I may be thrown to the wolves for saying this but I think a lot of people want / need things to seem different when they might not be.
    from my personal experience, I've never noticed the extreme and minute differences people have been railing on about for decades. I've enlarged film beyond it's breaking point
    I've scanned film and printed large, .. I've even presented darkroom prints and pigment prints to people who rail on and on and they couldn't even
    tell me which was which (even with their nose to the emulsion ). I've pretty much given up, whatever's there is there..

  4. #54
    Tin Can's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    20,454

    Re: Resolution Comparison Between Films?

    Be very happy IF you can SEE the dif

    I cannot
    Tin Can

Similar Threads

  1. lens that can take advantage of hi resolution films like CMS20
    By brighamr in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 14-Jun-2015, 10:37
  2. How Lower Resolution Lens Works on Large High Resolution Wet Plate Negative
    By Mustafa Umut Sarac in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Jan-2014, 15:04
  3. T-Max 400, HP-5, Tri-X comparison?
    By artflic in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 25-Sep-2010, 18:25
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 9-Jul-2010, 02:19
  5. Real resolution of films?
    By Glenn Kroeger in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-Jan-2001, 18:19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •