Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: The Mystery of Dad's Nikkor-W 210m f5.6

  1. #11
    William Whitaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NE Tennessee
    Posts
    1,423

    Re: The Mystery of Dad's Nikkor-W 210m f5.6

    The difference between the lenses may simply have been a means to use up existing inventory before switching to the newer version. Off-the-shelf is always cheaper to produce.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Seattle area, WA
    Posts
    1,331

    Re: The Mystery of Dad's Nikkor-W 210m f5.6

    I've noticed with a plasmat before that the focal length seems to be determined by the rear element, not really the front element. I learned this by using a lens where the rear element was off a 100mm and the front element a 150mm. Both elements were APO Sironar I believe, it made an image that looked normal, but it was 100mm, not 150mm or anywhere in between. Coverage was also about what you'd expect for the 100mm, kind of strange really. So maybe the theory of Nikon had some front-element backstock left isn't too far off.

Similar Threads

  1. Super Angulon 210m F8 - any good?
    By koh303 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 6-May-2014, 11:55
  2. Mounting a 210m f9 Computar in a shutter?
    By John Schneider in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-Jan-2009, 14:57
  3. Need Seal 210M manual
    By Joe_5422 in forum Business
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4-Mar-2008, 13:42

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •