Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 78

Thread: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Madisonville, LA
    Posts
    2,412

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    I would suggest looking for one at a good price, and if you don't like it, then sell it. You might also consider the 12" Artar or the 305 G-Claron, both in Copal 1 shutters. See if you can borrow one to try near you. Good luck. L

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Equally far from everything
    Posts
    413

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    I use the Nikkor 450 for portraits on both 8x10 and 11x14. It is a great lens.

  3. #13
    William Whitaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NE Tennessee
    Posts
    1,423

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Pacilla View Post
    I doubt that you'll have an easy time doing head/head & shoulders with this long a FL and this camera as you'll be at around full extension at those close focus range.

    So you may want to look into a 300mm FL as well. Just a thought

    Bear in mind Pepe's shots are not that close (They are full standing figure landscape not tight head shots / head & shoulders) so way less extension needed.
    Everybody's mileage varies. But for me, 450 on 8x10 is a bit long for H+S portraits. My choice is for something in the 12" - 14" range. And there are a LOT of choices in that range.
    And I'm speaking of 8x10 in general. NOT any specific camera.
    There are contrasting opinions expressed here. No surprise. You'll need to ante-up your money and find out what works best for you.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,901

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    8x10 is not the same a 4x5, significantly larger with a different set of problems-challenges.

    With a 450mm lens and 560mm of available bellows, head and shoulder portraits could be a problem of not enough bellows and camera stability due to camera support challenges. While the typical head and shoulder portrait focal length for 8x10 is 420mm to say 500mm, the ability for the camera to deal with a lens of this focal length can be surprisingly difficult.

    Example, on 5x7 with a 12" or 300mm lens, bellows required for head and shoulder is about 400mm, then there is how to balance and support the camera along with precise positioning the camera to where it is needed relative to the sitter. Then add the challenge of lighting which is IMO, as important and in some cases more important than camera & lens & film.

    Things to consider.
    Bernice

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,901

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Really the only way... get stuff and try it.

    Bernice

    Quote Originally Posted by William Whitaker View Post
    There are contrasting opinions expressed here. No surprise. You'll need to ante-up your money and find out what works best for you.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    22

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Bernice Loui View Post
    Really the only way... get stuff and try it.

    Bernice
    Hi,

    Lens is ordered...So now I will see in 2 months if it suit my need or not....

    Thanks to all of you for the discussions.

    Dom

  7. #17
    Serious Amateur Photographer pepeguitarra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    693

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Here is the set at head and shoulder set up distance:


    Intrepid 8x10 + Nikkor-M 450/9 by Palenquero Photography, on Flickr
    "I have never in my life made music for money or fame. God walks out of the room when you are thinking about money." -- Quincy Jones

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Woman in red !

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,581

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Rscaboy View Post
    Am I wrong with this interpretation ?
    All I can tell you is that I wouldn't use a Nikkor 450M on my Mk I. Perhaps the Mk II is more solid. Based on other replies here, you should be okay. Get a good copy of the lens, try it, and if it doesn't work out for you sell it, and find another alternative.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Loganville , GA
    Posts
    14,410

    Re: Nikkor M 450 F9 - Question

    Support means that it has enough bellows and extension to use a 600mm. It does not mean that it is strong enough to support this lens. Find the weight of the lens and ask the camera manufacturer if it can support it at portrait distances.

Similar Threads

  1. Nikkor 135mm W Question
    By 1750Shooter in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-Jul-2012, 11:33
  2. Apo Nikkor question
    By atlcruiser in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9-Dec-2011, 07:29
  3. Nikkor 450mm M Question
    By AnzaRunner in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 15-Apr-2009, 11:58
  4. 305 apo-nikkor question
    By Joseph O'Neil in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 27-Oct-2008, 15:46
  5. Nikkor question
    By Fred Braakman in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 20-Jan-2007, 07:54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •